Abstract
PURPOSE: When someone has a mental illness, family members may share the experience of stigma. Past research has established that family members' experiences of stigma by association predict psychological distress and lower quality-of-life.
METHODS: The present study, conducted with 503 family members of people with mental illness examined the prevalence of 14 different coping strategies. Of greater importance, we examined the role of these coping strategies as mediators of the relationships between stigma by association and family burden, on the one hand, and outcomes, such as psychological distress and quality-of-life, on the other.
RESULTS: The results showed that both perceived stigma by association and family burden are associated with greater psychological distress and lower quality-of-life, and that most coping strategies mediate these relationships.
CONCLUSIONS: Adaptive coping strategies were related to reduced negative outcomes, while most maladaptive coping strategies were related to enhanced negative outcomes. Implications for intervention development are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1233–1245 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| Early online date | 29 Jun 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2016 |
Keywords
- Stigma by association
- Family burden
- Psychological distress
- Quality-of-life
- Coping
- Mental illness
- QUALITY-OF-LIFE
- PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS
- STRATEGIES
- WORKPLACE
- RELATIVES
- BEHAVIOR
- COMPANY
- MODELS