Statutory and private health insurance in Germany and Chile: Two stories of coexistence and conflict

Stefanie Etteit*, Andres Roman-Urrestarazu

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademic

Abstract

In Germany and Chile, the market for private health insurance exists alongside and "within" a statutory health insurance system that covers a large majority of the population. Private cover comes in two forms: substitutive, chosen to replace statutory cover, which means that the privately insured do not contribute to this aspect of the social security system (unless statutory health insurance is partly funded through the government budget); and complementary or supplementary, allowing people to "top up" publicly financed benefits. In both countries, the vast majority of the population is covered by statutory health insurance. However, some parts of the population, mostly those who are able to afford it, have the option of choosing between private and statutory coverage. In Germany, the group of people given this choice is limited by regulation, with those allowed to "opt out" of the statutory system having to demonstrate that they have earnings above a threshold. Once they have chosen the private option, the possibility of returning to statutory cover is limited. In Chile, choice of substitutive private cover is also dependent on earnings as a private plan is significantly more expensive than contributions to the statutory system, but there is no fixed threshold for those who wish to opt out.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPrivate Health Insurance: History, Politics and Performance
Editors Elias Mossialos, Sarah Thomson, Anna Sagan
PublisherCambridge University Press
Chapter6
Pages180-220
Number of pages41
ISBN (Electronic)9781139026468
ISBN (Print)9780521125826
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Statutory and private health insurance in Germany and Chile: Two stories of coexistence and conflict'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this