State of the Art of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Electrophysiology in 2025: A Scientific Statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), and the ESC Working Group on E-Cardiology

Emma Svennberg*, Janet K. Han, Enrico G. Caiani, Sandy Engelhardt, Sabine Ernst, Paul Friedman, Rodrigue Garcia, Hamid Ghanbari, Gerhard Hindricks, Sharon H. Man, Jose Millet, Sanjiv M. Narayan, G. Andre Ng, Peter A. Noseworthy, Fleur V. Y. Tjong, Julia Ramirez, Jagmeet P. Singh, Natalia Trayanova, David Duncker, Jacob Tfelt HansenJoseph Barker, Ruben Casado-Arroyo, Neal A. Chatterjee, Giulio Conte, Soren Zoega Diederichsen, Dominik Linz, Arun Umesh Mahtani, Alessandro Zorzi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Aims Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform cardiac electrophysiology (EP), particularly in arrhythmia detection, procedural optimization, and patient outcome prediction. However, a standardized approach to reporting and understanding AI-related research in EP is lacking. This scientific statement aims to develop and apply a checklist for AI-related research reporting in EP to enhance transparency, reproducibility, and understandability in the field. Methods and results An AI checklist specific to EP was developed with expert input from the writing group and voted on using a modified Delphi process, leading to the development of a 29-item checklist. The checklist was subsequently applied to assess reporting practices to identify areas where improvements could be made and provide an overview of the state of the art in AI-related EP research in three domains from May 2021 until May 2024: atrial fibrillation (AF) management, sudden cardiac death (SCD), and EP lab applications. The EHRA AI checklist was applied to 31 studies in AF management, 18 studies in SCD, and 6 studies in EP lab applications. Results differed between the different domains, but in no domain reporting of a specific item exceeded 55% of included papers. Key areas such as trial registration, participant details, data handling, and training performance were underreported (<20%). The checklist application highlighted areas where reporting practices could be improved to promote clearer, more comprehensive AI research in EP. Conclusion The EHRA AI checklist provides a structured framework for reporting AI research in EP. Its use can improve understanding but also enhance the reproducibility and transparency of AI studies, fostering more robust and reliable integration of AI into clinical EP practice.[GRAPHICS].
Original languageEnglish
Article numbereuaf071
Number of pages19
JournalEP Europace
Volume27
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2025

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Checklist
  • Machine learning
  • Electrophysiology
  • SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH
  • ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION
  • SINUS RHYTHM
  • PREDICTION
  • ALGORITHM
  • ELECTROCARDIOGRAM
  • DYSFUNCTION
  • VALIDATION
  • ABLATION
  • DEVICES

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'State of the Art of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Electrophysiology in 2025: A Scientific Statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), and the ESC Working Group on E-Cardiology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this