State of the art in benefit-risk analysis: Economics and marketing-finance

N. Kalogeras, G.J. Odekerken-Schröder, J.M.E. Pennings, H. Gunnlaugsdottir, F. Holm, O. Leino, J. Luteijn, S. Magnusson, M. Pohjola, M.J. Tijhuis, J. Tuomisto, O. Ueland, B. White, H. Verhagen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

All market participants (e.g., investors, producers, consumers) accept a certain level of risk as necessary to achieve certain benefits. There are many types of risk including price, production, financial, institutional, and individual human risks. All these risks should be effectively managed in order to derive the utmost of benefits and avoid disruption and/or catastrophic economic consequences for the food industry. The identification, analysis, determination, and understanding of the benefit-risk trade-offs of market participants in the food markets may help policy makers, financial analysts and marketers to make well-informed and effective corporate investment strategies in order to deal with highly uncertain and risky situations.

In this paper, we discuss the role that benefits and risks play in the formation of the decision-making process of market-participants, who are engaged in the upstream and downstream stages of the food supply chain. In addition, we review the most common approaches (expected utility model and psychometrics) for measuring benefit-risk trade-offs in the economics and marketing-finance literature, and different factors that may affect the economic behaviour in the light of benefit-risk analyses.

Building on the findings of our review, we introduce a conceptual framework to study the benefit-risk behaviour of market participants. Specifically, we suggest the decoupling of benefits and risks into the separate components of utilitarian benefits, hedonic benefits, and risk attitude and risk perception, respectively. Predicting and explaining how market participants in the food industry form their overall attitude in light of benefit-risk trade-offs may be critical for policy-makers and managers who need to understand the drivers of the economic behaviour of market participants with respect to production, marketing and consumption of food products. 

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)56-66
Number of pages11
JournalFood and Chemical Toxicology
Volume50
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012

Keywords

  • Benefit-risk trade-offs
  • Decoupling
  • Utility
  • Economics
  • Marketing-Finance
  • PERCEIVED RISK
  • UTILITY-FUNCTIONS
  • EXPECTED UTILITY
  • EMPIRICAL-TEST
  • PRODUCT QUALITY
  • CONSUMER CHOICE
  • ATTITUDES
  • FARMERS
  • MODEL
  • AVERSION

Cite this

Kalogeras, N. ; Odekerken-Schröder, G.J. ; Pennings, J.M.E. ; Gunnlaugsdottir, H. ; Holm, F. ; Leino, O. ; Luteijn, J. ; Magnusson, S. ; Pohjola, M. ; Tijhuis, M.J. ; Tuomisto, J. ; Ueland, O. ; White, B. ; Verhagen, H. / State of the art in benefit-risk analysis: Economics and marketing-finance. In: Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2012 ; Vol. 50, No. 1. pp. 56-66.
@article{bf531d2b68b64ac9bbb6aef0ad6a71b0,
title = "State of the art in benefit-risk analysis: Economics and marketing-finance",
abstract = "All market participants (e.g., investors, producers, consumers) accept a certain level of risk as necessary to achieve certain benefits. There are many types of risk including price, production, financial, institutional, and individual human risks. All these risks should be effectively managed in order to derive the utmost of benefits and avoid disruption and/or catastrophic economic consequences for the food industry. The identification, analysis, determination, and understanding of the benefit-risk trade-offs of market participants in the food markets may help policy makers, financial analysts and marketers to make well-informed and effective corporate investment strategies in order to deal with highly uncertain and risky situations.In this paper, we discuss the role that benefits and risks play in the formation of the decision-making process of market-participants, who are engaged in the upstream and downstream stages of the food supply chain. In addition, we review the most common approaches (expected utility model and psychometrics) for measuring benefit-risk trade-offs in the economics and marketing-finance literature, and different factors that may affect the economic behaviour in the light of benefit-risk analyses.Building on the findings of our review, we introduce a conceptual framework to study the benefit-risk behaviour of market participants. Specifically, we suggest the decoupling of benefits and risks into the separate components of utilitarian benefits, hedonic benefits, and risk attitude and risk perception, respectively. Predicting and explaining how market participants in the food industry form their overall attitude in light of benefit-risk trade-offs may be critical for policy-makers and managers who need to understand the drivers of the economic behaviour of market participants with respect to production, marketing and consumption of food products. ",
keywords = "Benefit-risk trade-offs, Decoupling, Utility, Economics, Marketing-Finance, PERCEIVED RISK, UTILITY-FUNCTIONS, EXPECTED UTILITY, EMPIRICAL-TEST, PRODUCT QUALITY, CONSUMER CHOICE, ATTITUDES, FARMERS, MODEL, AVERSION",
author = "N. Kalogeras and G.J. Odekerken-Schr{\"o}der and J.M.E. Pennings and H. Gunnlaugsdottir and F. Holm and O. Leino and J. Luteijn and S. Magnusson and M. Pohjola and M.J. Tijhuis and J. Tuomisto and O. Ueland and B. White and H. Verhagen",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.fct.2011.07.066",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "56--66",
journal = "Food and Chemical Toxicology",
issn = "0278-6915",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "1",

}

Kalogeras, N, Odekerken-Schröder, GJ, Pennings, JME, Gunnlaugsdottir, H, Holm, F, Leino, O, Luteijn, J, Magnusson, S, Pohjola, M, Tijhuis, MJ, Tuomisto, J, Ueland, O, White, B & Verhagen, H 2012, 'State of the art in benefit-risk analysis: Economics and marketing-finance', Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.07.066

State of the art in benefit-risk analysis: Economics and marketing-finance. / Kalogeras, N.; Odekerken-Schröder, G.J.; Pennings, J.M.E.; Gunnlaugsdottir, H.; Holm, F.; Leino, O.; Luteijn, J.; Magnusson, S.; Pohjola, M.; Tijhuis, M.J.; Tuomisto, J.; Ueland, O.; White, B.; Verhagen, H.

In: Food and Chemical Toxicology, Vol. 50, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 56-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - State of the art in benefit-risk analysis: Economics and marketing-finance

AU - Kalogeras, N.

AU - Odekerken-Schröder, G.J.

AU - Pennings, J.M.E.

AU - Gunnlaugsdottir, H.

AU - Holm, F.

AU - Leino, O.

AU - Luteijn, J.

AU - Magnusson, S.

AU - Pohjola, M.

AU - Tijhuis, M.J.

AU - Tuomisto, J.

AU - Ueland, O.

AU - White, B.

AU - Verhagen, H.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - All market participants (e.g., investors, producers, consumers) accept a certain level of risk as necessary to achieve certain benefits. There are many types of risk including price, production, financial, institutional, and individual human risks. All these risks should be effectively managed in order to derive the utmost of benefits and avoid disruption and/or catastrophic economic consequences for the food industry. The identification, analysis, determination, and understanding of the benefit-risk trade-offs of market participants in the food markets may help policy makers, financial analysts and marketers to make well-informed and effective corporate investment strategies in order to deal with highly uncertain and risky situations.In this paper, we discuss the role that benefits and risks play in the formation of the decision-making process of market-participants, who are engaged in the upstream and downstream stages of the food supply chain. In addition, we review the most common approaches (expected utility model and psychometrics) for measuring benefit-risk trade-offs in the economics and marketing-finance literature, and different factors that may affect the economic behaviour in the light of benefit-risk analyses.Building on the findings of our review, we introduce a conceptual framework to study the benefit-risk behaviour of market participants. Specifically, we suggest the decoupling of benefits and risks into the separate components of utilitarian benefits, hedonic benefits, and risk attitude and risk perception, respectively. Predicting and explaining how market participants in the food industry form their overall attitude in light of benefit-risk trade-offs may be critical for policy-makers and managers who need to understand the drivers of the economic behaviour of market participants with respect to production, marketing and consumption of food products. 

AB - All market participants (e.g., investors, producers, consumers) accept a certain level of risk as necessary to achieve certain benefits. There are many types of risk including price, production, financial, institutional, and individual human risks. All these risks should be effectively managed in order to derive the utmost of benefits and avoid disruption and/or catastrophic economic consequences for the food industry. The identification, analysis, determination, and understanding of the benefit-risk trade-offs of market participants in the food markets may help policy makers, financial analysts and marketers to make well-informed and effective corporate investment strategies in order to deal with highly uncertain and risky situations.In this paper, we discuss the role that benefits and risks play in the formation of the decision-making process of market-participants, who are engaged in the upstream and downstream stages of the food supply chain. In addition, we review the most common approaches (expected utility model and psychometrics) for measuring benefit-risk trade-offs in the economics and marketing-finance literature, and different factors that may affect the economic behaviour in the light of benefit-risk analyses.Building on the findings of our review, we introduce a conceptual framework to study the benefit-risk behaviour of market participants. Specifically, we suggest the decoupling of benefits and risks into the separate components of utilitarian benefits, hedonic benefits, and risk attitude and risk perception, respectively. Predicting and explaining how market participants in the food industry form their overall attitude in light of benefit-risk trade-offs may be critical for policy-makers and managers who need to understand the drivers of the economic behaviour of market participants with respect to production, marketing and consumption of food products. 

KW - Benefit-risk trade-offs

KW - Decoupling

KW - Utility

KW - Economics

KW - Marketing-Finance

KW - PERCEIVED RISK

KW - UTILITY-FUNCTIONS

KW - EXPECTED UTILITY

KW - EMPIRICAL-TEST

KW - PRODUCT QUALITY

KW - CONSUMER CHOICE

KW - ATTITUDES

KW - FARMERS

KW - MODEL

KW - AVERSION

U2 - 10.1016/j.fct.2011.07.066

DO - 10.1016/j.fct.2011.07.066

M3 - Review article

VL - 50

SP - 56

EP - 66

JO - Food and Chemical Toxicology

JF - Food and Chemical Toxicology

SN - 0278-6915

IS - 1

ER -