Spatial variation in tobacco smoking among pregnant women in South Limburg, the Netherlands, 2016-2018: Small area estimations using a Bayesian approach

Haoyi Wang*, Luc Smits, Polina Putrik

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The aim of this study was to provide small area estimations (SAE) of smoking prevalence during pregnancy in South Limburg, the Netherlands. To illustrate improvements in accuracy and precision of estimates compared to traditional frequentist analyses, we used Bayesian inference with the Integrated nested Laplace approximation to account for spatial structures and area-level proxies. Results revealed a heterogenous prevalence of smoking with a range between 6.7% (95% credible interval 4.7,8.7) and 16.7% (14.3,19.2) among municipalities; and an even more heterogenous prevalence among neighbourhoods a range from 0 (-14.9,6.5) to 32.1 (20.3,46.8). Clusters with significant lower- and higher-than-average risk were identified (RR between 0.6-1.4 and 0.0-2.4 for municipality- and neighbourhood-level, respectively). Higher proportion of non-western migrants and lower average income were associated with higher prevalence of tobacco smoking. The obtained estimates should inform local prevention policies, as well as provide methodological example for public health researchers on application of Bayesian methods for SAE.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100525
Number of pages9
JournalSpatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
Volume42
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2022

Keywords

  • Bayes Theorem
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Netherlands/epidemiology
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnant Women
  • Prevalence
  • Smoking/epidemiology
  • Tobacco Smoking
  • Tobacco smoking
  • Spatial analysis
  • PREVENTION
  • Bayesian inference
  • Small area estimation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Spatial variation in tobacco smoking among pregnant women in South Limburg, the Netherlands, 2016-2018: Small area estimations using a Bayesian approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this