Smoke-free legislation and paediatric hospitalisations for acute respiratory tract infections: national quasi-experimental study with unexpected findings and important methodological implications

Jasper V. Been*, Daniel F. Mackay, Christopher Millett, Ireneous Soyiri, Constant P. van Schayck, Jill P. Pell, Aziz Sheikh

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Web of Science)


Objectives We investigated whether Scottish implementation of smoke-free legislation was associated with a reduction in unplanned hospitalisations or deaths (events') due to respiratory tract infections (RTIs) among children.

Design Interrupted time series (ITS).

Setting/participants Children aged 0-12 years living in Scotland during 1996-2012.

Intervention National comprehensive smoke-free legislation (March 2006).

Main outcome measure Acute RTI events in the Scottish Morbidity Record-01 and/or National Records of Scotland Death Records.

Results 135 134 RTI events were observed over 155million patient-months. In our prespecified negative binomial regression model accounting for underlying temporal trends, seasonality, sex, age group, region, urbanisation level, socioeconomic status and seven-valent pneumococcal vaccination status, smoke-free legislation was associated with an immediate rise in RTI events (incidence rate ratio (IRR)=1.24, 95%CI 1.20 to 1.28) and an additional gradual increase (IRR=1.05/year, 95%CI 1.05 to 1.06). Given this unanticipated finding, we conducted a number of post hoc exploratory analyses. Among these, automatic break point detection indicated that the rise in RTI events actually preceded the smoke-free law by 16 months. When accounting for this break point, smoke-free legislation was associated with a gradual decrease in acute RTI events: IRR=0.91/year, 95%CI 0.87 to 0.96.

Conclusions Our prespecified ITS approach suggested that implementation of smoke-free legislation in Scotland was associated with an increase in paediatric RTI events. We were concerned that this result, which contradicted published evidence, was spurious. The association was indeed reversed when accounting for an unanticipated antecedent break point in the temporal trend, suggesting that the legislation may in fact be protective. ITS analyses should be subjected to comprehensive robustness checks to assess consistency.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E160-E166
Number of pages7
JournalTobacco Control
Issue numberE2
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018


  • prevention
  • priority
  • special populations
  • public policy
  • secondhand smoke

Cite this