Six and 12 months' effects of individual joint protection education in people with rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized controlled trial

Karin Niedermann*, Stefan Buchi, Adrian Ciurea, Regula Kubli, Claudia Steurer-Stey, Peter M. Villiger, Rob A. De Bie

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


Backgiround: Joint protection (JP) education for people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is effective when applying psycho-educational teaching strategies. The Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure (PRISM) was used to identify relevant JP education goals and life aspects, both supporting motivation and behaviour change. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of individual JP education, PRISM-based (PRISM-JP) vs. conventional (C-JP), in people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: An assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted in four rheumatology centres. Patients were randomized to PRISM-JP or C-JP, consisting of five JP education sessions over three months. Primary outcome was JP behaviour at six and 12 months. Results: A total of 53 RA patients participated. The PRISM-JP group (n = 26) demonstrated significantly more JP behaviour at six months (effect size ES = 0.32; p = 0.02) and 12 months (ES = 0.28; p = 0.04) than the C-JP (n = 27). Within-group analysis showed that the JP intervention was successful at six and 12 months in both groups (p <0.001). At 12 months the PRISM-JP group had better JP self-efficacy (p = 0.02) and grip strength (p = 0.04) compared with baseline. Conclusion: PRISM-JP was more effective than C-JP in terms of long-term JP behaviour at six and 12 months.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)360-369
JournalScandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2012


  • hand therapy
  • joint protection
  • patient education
  • occupational therapy
  • Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure (PRISM)
  • self-efficacy

Cite this