Similarities and differences between electrocardiogram signs of left bundle-branch block and left-ventricular uncoupling

Mark Potse*, Dorian Krause, Ljuba Bacharova, Rolf Krause, Frits W. Prinzen, Angelo Auricchio

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Aims A left bundle-branch block (LBBB) electrocardiogram (ECG) type may be caused by either a block in the left branch of the ventricular conduction system or by uncoupling in the working myocardium. We used a realistic large-scale computer model to evaluate the effects of uncoupling with and without left-sided block and in combination with biventricular pacing. Methods and results Action potential propagation was simulated using a reaction-diffusion model of the human ventricles. Electrocardiograms and cardiac electrograms were computed from the simulated action potentials by solving the bidomain equations. In all situations, diffuse uncoupling reduced QRS amplitude, prolonged QRS duration, and rotated the QRS axis leftward. Uncoupling by 50 increased QRS duration from 90 to 120 ms with a normal conduction system and from 140 to 190 ms when the left bundle branch was blocked. Biventricular pacing did not change QRS duration but reduced total ventricular activation time. Conclusion Uncoupling in the working myocardium can mimic left-sided block in the ventricular conduction system and can explain an LBBB ECG pattern with relatively low amplitude. Biventricular pacing improves ventricular activation in true LBBB with or without uncoupling but not in case of 50 uncoupling alone.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)V33-V39
JournalEP Europace
Volume14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2012

Keywords

  • Left bundle-branch block
  • Conduction disease
  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • Computer models

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Similarities and differences between electrocardiogram signs of left bundle-branch block and left-ventricular uncoupling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this