TY - JOUR
T1 - Side effect management and procedural best practices with indwelling intravesical drug-releasing systems in the treatment of bladder cancer
T2 - recommendations from expert panels
AU - Pradere, Benjamin
AU - Schuit, Maarten
AU - Guerrero-Ramos, Félix
AU - Shariat, Shahrokh F
AU - Kitamura, Hiroshi
AU - Jacob, Joseph M
AU - Bao, Yige
AU - Heesakkers, John
AU - Peters, Kenneth M
AU - Cahn, David J
AU - De Troyer, Bart
AU - Herrera Imbroda, Bernardo
AU - Morris, David S
AU - Pieczonka, Christopher M
AU - Wei, Qiang
AU - Bhanvadia, Sumeet
AU - Somer, Robert
AU - Jessner, Wolfgang
AU - Triantos, Spyros
AU - Sánchez de Llano, Cristina
AU - Maffeo, John C
AU - Sweiti, Hussein
AU - Psutka, Sarah P
PY - 2025/10/8
Y1 - 2025/10/8
N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide expert recommendations for side effect management in patients with bladder cancer receiving intravesical-drug releasing system (iDRS) treatment and for optimizing iDRS insertion procedure success. RECENT FINDINGS: Indwelling iDRS are designed to provide sustained local exposure to therapy. In clinical trials, frequent side effects of iDRS treatment were lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) (e.g., dysuria, pollakiuria, micturition urgency), urinary tract infections (UTIs), and hematuria. These side effects are generally low grade, but if not properly managed, may lead to treatment interruptions or discontinuations. As data are limited, practical recommendations based on expert opinion for the management of common side effects and best practices for iDRS insertion procedures may improve treatment adherence and optimize outcomes in patients with bladder cancer receiving iDRS. SUMMARY: Two separate expert panels were convened to develop recommendations for side effect management with iDRS and optimizing iDRS insertion procedure success. Stepwise treatment-specific management strategies for LUTS, UTIs, and hematuria in patients receiving iDRS treatment that are familiar to practicing urologists are presented, including considerations for continuation or discontinuation of iDRS treatment. Several advanced techniques can be considered to improve iDRS insertions based on variations in patient anatomy.
AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide expert recommendations for side effect management in patients with bladder cancer receiving intravesical-drug releasing system (iDRS) treatment and for optimizing iDRS insertion procedure success. RECENT FINDINGS: Indwelling iDRS are designed to provide sustained local exposure to therapy. In clinical trials, frequent side effects of iDRS treatment were lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) (e.g., dysuria, pollakiuria, micturition urgency), urinary tract infections (UTIs), and hematuria. These side effects are generally low grade, but if not properly managed, may lead to treatment interruptions or discontinuations. As data are limited, practical recommendations based on expert opinion for the management of common side effects and best practices for iDRS insertion procedures may improve treatment adherence and optimize outcomes in patients with bladder cancer receiving iDRS. SUMMARY: Two separate expert panels were convened to develop recommendations for side effect management with iDRS and optimizing iDRS insertion procedure success. Stepwise treatment-specific management strategies for LUTS, UTIs, and hematuria in patients receiving iDRS treatment that are familiar to practicing urologists are presented, including considerations for continuation or discontinuation of iDRS treatment. Several advanced techniques can be considered to improve iDRS insertions based on variations in patient anatomy.
KW - TAR-200
KW - bladder cancer
KW - gemcitabine intravesical system
KW - intravesical therapy
KW - intravesical-drug releasing system
KW - lower urinary tract symptoms
U2 - 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001350
DO - 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001350
M3 - Article
SN - 0963-0643
VL - 36
SP - 123
EP - 133
JO - Current Opinion in Urology
JF - Current Opinion in Urology
IS - 1
ER -