TY - JOUR
T1 - Shifting care from hospital to community, a strategy to integrate care in Singapore: process evaluation of implementation fidelity
AU - Nurjono, M.
AU - Shrestha, P.
AU - Ang, I.Y.H.
AU - Shiraz, F.
AU - Eh, K.X.
AU - Toh, S.A.E.S.
AU - Vrijhoef, H.J.M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by an internal grant (grant number NUHSRO/2016/ 008/RO5 + 5/FY16CF/LOA) from NUHS Research Office, Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (CHSPR) core funding and the Singapore Ministry of Health’s National Medical Research Council Centre Grant Programme (grant number: NMRC/CG/C026/2017_NUHS) for Singapore Population Health Improvement Centre (SPHERiC). Funders have no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s).
PY - 2020/5/24
Y1 - 2020/5/24
N2 - Background Accessibility to efficient and person-centered healthcare delivery drives healthcare transformation in many countries. In Singapore, specialist outpatient clinics (SOCs) are commonly congested due to increasing demands for chronic care. To improve this situation, the National University Health System (NUHS) Regional Health System (RHS) started an integrated care initiative,the Right-Site Care (RSC) program in 2014. Through collaborations between SOCs at the National University Hospital and primary and community care (PCC) clinics in the western region of the county, the program was designed to facilitate timely discharge and appropriate transition of patients, who no longer required specialist care, to the community. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation fidelity of the NUHS RHS RSC program using the modified Conceptual Framework for Implementation Fidelity (CFIF), at three distinct levels; providers, organizational, and system levels to explain outcomes of the program and to inform further development of (similar) programs. Methods A convergent parallel mixed methods study using the realist evaluation approach was used. Data were collected between 2016 and 2018 through non-participatory observations, reviews of medical records and program database, together with semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers. Triangulation of data streams was applied guided by the modified CFIF. Results Our findings showed four out of six program components were implemented with low level of fidelity, and 9112 suitable patients were referred to the program while 3032 (33.3%) declined to be enrolled. Moderating factors found to influence fidelity included: (i) complexity of program, (ii) evolving providers' responsiveness, (iii) facilitation through synergistic partnership, training of PCC providers by specialists and supportive structures: care coordinators, guiding protocols, shared electronic medical record and shared pharmacy, (iv) lack of organization reinforcement, and (v) mismatch between program goals, healthcare financing and providers' reimbursement. Conclusion Functional integration alone is insufficient for a successful right-site care program implementation. Improvement in relationships between providers, organizations, and patients are also warranted for further development of the program.
AB - Background Accessibility to efficient and person-centered healthcare delivery drives healthcare transformation in many countries. In Singapore, specialist outpatient clinics (SOCs) are commonly congested due to increasing demands for chronic care. To improve this situation, the National University Health System (NUHS) Regional Health System (RHS) started an integrated care initiative,the Right-Site Care (RSC) program in 2014. Through collaborations between SOCs at the National University Hospital and primary and community care (PCC) clinics in the western region of the county, the program was designed to facilitate timely discharge and appropriate transition of patients, who no longer required specialist care, to the community. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation fidelity of the NUHS RHS RSC program using the modified Conceptual Framework for Implementation Fidelity (CFIF), at three distinct levels; providers, organizational, and system levels to explain outcomes of the program and to inform further development of (similar) programs. Methods A convergent parallel mixed methods study using the realist evaluation approach was used. Data were collected between 2016 and 2018 through non-participatory observations, reviews of medical records and program database, together with semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers. Triangulation of data streams was applied guided by the modified CFIF. Results Our findings showed four out of six program components were implemented with low level of fidelity, and 9112 suitable patients were referred to the program while 3032 (33.3%) declined to be enrolled. Moderating factors found to influence fidelity included: (i) complexity of program, (ii) evolving providers' responsiveness, (iii) facilitation through synergistic partnership, training of PCC providers by specialists and supportive structures: care coordinators, guiding protocols, shared electronic medical record and shared pharmacy, (iv) lack of organization reinforcement, and (v) mismatch between program goals, healthcare financing and providers' reimbursement. Conclusion Functional integration alone is insufficient for a successful right-site care program implementation. Improvement in relationships between providers, organizations, and patients are also warranted for further development of the program.
KW - collaboration
KW - complex adaptive systems
KW - delivery
KW - health outcomes
KW - implementation fidelity
KW - integrated care
KW - multi-morbidity
KW - pcmh
KW - process evaluation
KW - realist evaluation
KW - shift from hospital to community
KW - COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS
KW - Shift from hospital to community
KW - Implementation fidelity
KW - PCMH
KW - Process evaluation
KW - DELIVERY
KW - Integrated care
KW - COLLABORATION
KW - Multi-morbidity
KW - Realist evaluation
KW - HEALTH OUTCOMES
U2 - 10.1186/s12913-020-05263-w
DO - 10.1186/s12913-020-05263-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 32448283
SN - 1472-6963
VL - 20
JO - BMC Health Services Research
JF - BMC Health Services Research
IS - 1
M1 - 452
ER -