Abstract
Telepresence robots enable users to interact with remote environments, but efficient and intuitive navigation remains a challenge. In this work, we developed and evaluated a shared control method, in which the robot navigates autonomously while allowing users to affect the path generation to better suit their needs. We compared this with control switching, where users toggle between direct and automated control. We hypothesized that shared control would maintain efficiency comparable to control switching while potentially reducing user workload. The results of two consecutive user studies (each with final sample of n = 20) showed that shared control does not degrade navigation efficiency, but did not show a significant reduction in task load compared to control switching. Further research is needed to explore the underlying factors that influence user preference and performance in these control systems.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | 2025 IEEE Conference on Telepresence, Telepresence 2025 |
| Publisher | IEEE |
| Pages | 53-60 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9798331586164 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
| Event | 2025 IEEE Conference on Telepresence, Telepresence 2025 - Leiden, Netherlands Duration: 8 Sept 2025 → 10 Sept 2025 https://telepresence.ieee.org/events/the-2025-ieee-telepresence-conference/ |
Conference
| Conference | 2025 IEEE Conference on Telepresence, Telepresence 2025 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Netherlands |
| City | Leiden |
| Period | 8/09/25 → 10/09/25 |
| Internet address |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Sharing but Not Caring: Similar Outcomes for Shared Control and Switching Control in Telepresence-Robot Navigation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver