Abstract
Adolescents and young adults are highly focused on peer evaluation, but little is known about sources of their differential sensitivity. We examined to what extent sensitivity to peer evaluation is influenced by interacting environmental and genetic factors. A sample of 354 healthy adolescent twin pairs (n=708) took part in a structured, laboratory task in which they were exposed to peer evaluation. The proportion of the variance in sensitivity to peer evaluation due to genetic and environmental factors was estimated, as was the association with specific a priori environmental risk factors. Differences in sensitivity to peer evaluation between adolescents were explained mainly by non-shared environmental influences. The results on shared environmental influences were not conclusive. No impact of latent genetic factors or gene-environment interactions was found. Adolescents with lower self-rated positions on the social ladder or who reported to have been bullied more severely showed significantly stronger responses to peer evaluation. Not genes, but subjective social status and past experience of being bullied seem to impact sensitivity to peer evaluation. This suggests that altered response to peer evaluation is the outcome of cumulative sensitization to social interactions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 766-778 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Child Psychiatry & Human Development |
Volume | 49 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2018 |
Keywords
- Peer evaluation
- Gene-environment interactions
- Twin design
- Bullying
- Subjective social status
- Adolescents
- SUBJECTIVE SOCIAL-STATUS
- IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST
- ADRENAL AXIS RESPONSES
- CHILDHOOD TRAUMA
- PSYCHOSOCIAL STRESS
- CORTISOL RESPONSES
- BIRTH-WEIGHT
- SURVEY EFPTS
- DAILY-LIFE
- CLINICAL-IMPLICATIONS