Abstract
The exercise of self-control is of great significance in people's daily lives and in the organization of social institutions. The reasonableness of the self-control concept, however, has been challenged by recent developments in cognitive, behavioral, and neurosciences that identify human behavior as a result of complex automatic processes generated by people's environments. Collating more data on self-control and developing new theoretical approaches is crucial to meeting this challenge. Still, this article argues that a conceptual analysis of the meaning of self-control is also needed. Reflecting on recent work in philosophy, it discusses how self-controlled behavior is characterized not only by distinct causal mechanisms, but also by fundamental normative evaluations. Four conceptualizations of self-control will be presented to highlight why the corresponding self-control failures are essentially also normative failures. Furthermore, it discusses how the normativity of self-controlled behavior can contribute to further theorizing in social psychology.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 25-44 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Theory & Psychology |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 1 Dec 2014 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Feb 2015 |
Keywords
- making up one's mind
- normativity
- philosophy of action
- recklessness
- resistibility
- self
- self-control
- social psychology
- temptation
- weakness of will
- LIMITED RESOURCE
- MORAL MUSCLE
- BEHAVIOR
- DEPLETION
- WILL
- PERSONALITY
- DELAY
- GRATIFICATION
- AUTOMATICITY
- WILLPOWER