Seeing eye to eye: social augmented reality and shared decision making in the marketplace

Tim Hilken, Debbie I. Keeling, Ko de Ruyter, Dominik Mahr, Mathew Chylinski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Firms increasingly seek to improve the online shopping experience by enabling customers to exchange product recommendations through social augmented reality (AR).We utilize socially situated cognition theory and conduct a series of five studies to explore how social AR supports shared decision making in recommender–decision maker dyads. We demonstrate that optimal configurations of social AR, that is, a static (vs. dynamic) point-of-view sharing format matched with an image-enhanced (vs. text-only) communicative act, increase recommenders’ comfort with providing advice and decision makers’ likelihood of using the advice in their choice. For both, these effects are due to a sense of social empowerment, which also stimulates recommenders’ desire for a product and positive behavioral intentions. However, recommenders’ communication motives impose boundary conditions. When recommenders have strong impression management concerns, this weakens the effect of social empowerment on recommendation comfort. Furthermore, the stronger a recommender’s persuasion goal, the less likely the decision maker is to use the recommendation in their choice.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 30 Aug 2019

Keywords

  • Social augmented reality
  • Online shopping
  • Shared decision making
  • Customer-to-customer communication
  • Socially situated cognition

Cite this

@article{4fff73a3a1d64512b50f241129fb649a,
title = "Seeing eye to eye: social augmented reality and shared decision making in the marketplace",
abstract = "Firms increasingly seek to improve the online shopping experience by enabling customers to exchange product recommendations through social augmented reality (AR).We utilize socially situated cognition theory and conduct a series of five studies to explore how social AR supports shared decision making in recommender–decision maker dyads. We demonstrate that optimal configurations of social AR, that is, a static (vs. dynamic) point-of-view sharing format matched with an image-enhanced (vs. text-only) communicative act, increase recommenders’ comfort with providing advice and decision makers’ likelihood of using the advice in their choice. For both, these effects are due to a sense of social empowerment, which also stimulates recommenders’ desire for a product and positive behavioral intentions. However, recommenders’ communication motives impose boundary conditions. When recommenders have strong impression management concerns, this weakens the effect of social empowerment on recommendation comfort. Furthermore, the stronger a recommender’s persuasion goal, the less likely the decision maker is to use the recommendation in their choice.",
keywords = "Social augmented reality, Online shopping, Shared decision making, Customer-to-customer communication, Socially situated cognition",
author = "Tim Hilken and Keeling, {Debbie I.} and {de Ruyter}, Ko and Dominik Mahr and Mathew Chylinski",
note = "data source: experimental data collected at Maastricht Unversity",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1007/s11747-019-00688-0",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science",
issn = "0092-0703",
publisher = "Springer, Cham",

}

Seeing eye to eye: social augmented reality and shared decision making in the marketplace. / Hilken, Tim; Keeling, Debbie I.; de Ruyter, Ko; Mahr, Dominik; Chylinski, Mathew.

In: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30.08.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seeing eye to eye: social augmented reality and shared decision making in the marketplace

AU - Hilken, Tim

AU - Keeling, Debbie I.

AU - de Ruyter, Ko

AU - Mahr, Dominik

AU - Chylinski, Mathew

N1 - data source: experimental data collected at Maastricht Unversity

PY - 2019/8/30

Y1 - 2019/8/30

N2 - Firms increasingly seek to improve the online shopping experience by enabling customers to exchange product recommendations through social augmented reality (AR).We utilize socially situated cognition theory and conduct a series of five studies to explore how social AR supports shared decision making in recommender–decision maker dyads. We demonstrate that optimal configurations of social AR, that is, a static (vs. dynamic) point-of-view sharing format matched with an image-enhanced (vs. text-only) communicative act, increase recommenders’ comfort with providing advice and decision makers’ likelihood of using the advice in their choice. For both, these effects are due to a sense of social empowerment, which also stimulates recommenders’ desire for a product and positive behavioral intentions. However, recommenders’ communication motives impose boundary conditions. When recommenders have strong impression management concerns, this weakens the effect of social empowerment on recommendation comfort. Furthermore, the stronger a recommender’s persuasion goal, the less likely the decision maker is to use the recommendation in their choice.

AB - Firms increasingly seek to improve the online shopping experience by enabling customers to exchange product recommendations through social augmented reality (AR).We utilize socially situated cognition theory and conduct a series of five studies to explore how social AR supports shared decision making in recommender–decision maker dyads. We demonstrate that optimal configurations of social AR, that is, a static (vs. dynamic) point-of-view sharing format matched with an image-enhanced (vs. text-only) communicative act, increase recommenders’ comfort with providing advice and decision makers’ likelihood of using the advice in their choice. For both, these effects are due to a sense of social empowerment, which also stimulates recommenders’ desire for a product and positive behavioral intentions. However, recommenders’ communication motives impose boundary conditions. When recommenders have strong impression management concerns, this weakens the effect of social empowerment on recommendation comfort. Furthermore, the stronger a recommender’s persuasion goal, the less likely the decision maker is to use the recommendation in their choice.

KW - Social augmented reality

KW - Online shopping

KW - Shared decision making

KW - Customer-to-customer communication

KW - Socially situated cognition

U2 - 10.1007/s11747-019-00688-0

DO - 10.1007/s11747-019-00688-0

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

JF - Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

SN - 0092-0703

ER -