Abstract
Lies wesseling’s chapter 4 traces the genealogy of evil children, by analysing the success of william march’s portrayal of the demonic adoptee in the bad seed and its remediations. The success of this unprecedented work becomes all the more remarkable when we take its cultural context into account. The bad seed, wesseling argues, takes issue with the two dominant us discourses on adoption at the time. It subverts the adoption professionals’ paradigm of similarity, by suggesting that even when parents and children are perfectly matched, conforming as closely to the ideal of the white middle-class family as one could wish for, a bad seed could nevertheless still assert itself and wreak havoc. It is also at odds with the ‘love-and-faith-will-conquer-all’ optimism of inter-country-adoption-enthusiasts, suggesting that the normative nuclear family may not be such a great model for world politics after all.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Gothic Kinship |
| Editors | A Andeweg, S Zlosnik |
| Place of Publication | Manchester |
| Publisher | Manchester University Press |
| Pages | 63-81 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978 07190 8860 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2013 |