TY - JOUR
T1 - Screening for brain metastases in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and an actionable genomic alteration
T2 - A structured literature review
AU - Huijs, Jarno W. J.
AU - Bortolot, Martina
AU - Berghoff, Anna S.
AU - Brastianos, Priscilla K.
AU - Degens, Juliette H. R. J.
AU - De Ruysscher, Dirk K. M.
AU - Compter, Annette
AU - Hendriks, Lizza E. L.
PY - 2025/2/3
Y1 - 2025/2/3
N2 - Background Brain metastases (BM) frequently occur in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with actionable genomic alterations (AGA). Targeted therapies (TTs) improve outcomes, but differences in BM screening and eligibility criteria across trials make comparisons challenging. While stage IV NSCLC guidelines recommend BM screening, it is not mandatory, and imaging techniques vary.Methods Registrational and phase II/III trials of FDA/EMA-approved TTs for advanced NSCLC with AGA, published since 2012, were included. Main focus of the review was evaluation of baseline brain screening practices across trials. Information on BM follow-up, BM incidence, and BM-related outcomes was retrieved.Results Of 51 trials, 71% mandated baseline BM screening, and 27% mandated follow-up imaging for all patients. MRI was specified for BM assessment in 31% of the trials. BM incidence at baseline was high, up to 40% in the first-line setting. While most trials included patients with BM, eligibility criteria varied, and 43% of trials prespecified BM-related outcomes; 56% of phase III trials used BM as a stratification factor.Conclusion This review highlights the increasing attention to BM screening in NSCLC TT trials. However, substantial heterogeneity remains in BM eligibility, screening, outcomes, and follow-up. Standardizing these aspects in future trials is essential.
AB - Background Brain metastases (BM) frequently occur in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with actionable genomic alterations (AGA). Targeted therapies (TTs) improve outcomes, but differences in BM screening and eligibility criteria across trials make comparisons challenging. While stage IV NSCLC guidelines recommend BM screening, it is not mandatory, and imaging techniques vary.Methods Registrational and phase II/III trials of FDA/EMA-approved TTs for advanced NSCLC with AGA, published since 2012, were included. Main focus of the review was evaluation of baseline brain screening practices across trials. Information on BM follow-up, BM incidence, and BM-related outcomes was retrieved.Results Of 51 trials, 71% mandated baseline BM screening, and 27% mandated follow-up imaging for all patients. MRI was specified for BM assessment in 31% of the trials. BM incidence at baseline was high, up to 40% in the first-line setting. While most trials included patients with BM, eligibility criteria varied, and 43% of trials prespecified BM-related outcomes; 56% of phase III trials used BM as a stratification factor.Conclusion This review highlights the increasing attention to BM screening in NSCLC TT trials. However, substantial heterogeneity remains in BM eligibility, screening, outcomes, and follow-up. Standardizing these aspects in future trials is essential.
KW - actionable genomic alterations
KW - brain metastases
KW - MRI
KW - NSCLC
KW - screening
KW - OPEN-LABEL
KW - 1ST-LINE TREATMENT
KW - RESPONSE ASSESSMENT
KW - J-ALEX
KW - CHEMOTHERAPY
KW - CRIZOTINIB
KW - EFFICACY
KW - AFATINIB
KW - MUTATIONS
U2 - 10.1093/nop/npaf018
DO - 10.1093/nop/npaf018
M3 - (Systematic) Review article
SN - 2054-2585
JO - Neuro-Oncology Practice
JF - Neuro-Oncology Practice
ER -