Scientific research in primary health care: Lessons learned from a pragmatic multicenter implementation study in 101 general practices in the Netherlands

Moniek Koopman*, Jorn Reijnders, Bastiaan Kietselaer, Pim van der Harst, Rykel van Bruggen, Geert-Jan Dinant, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Robert Willemsen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In this short report, the challenges and lessons learned from implementing scientific research in primary care are discussed. It highlights the complexities of conducting studies in primary care, where 'Lasagna's Law' rules too often. Using the CONCRETE trial - a pragmatic multicenter implementation trial - as an example, eight key elements are identified as important factors for successfully conducting scientific research in primary care, such as optimizing digital processes and improving engagement.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere35
Number of pages4
JournalPrimary health care research & development
Volume26
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Apr 2025

Keywords

  • Implementation
  • computed tomography
  • coronary artery disease
  • coronary calcium score
  • general practioners
  • primary care
  • CHEST-PAIN

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Scientific research in primary health care: Lessons learned from a pragmatic multicenter implementation study in 101 general practices in the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this