Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Salvageable locoregional recurrence and stoma rate after local excision of pT1-2 rectal cancer - A nationwide cross-sectional cohort study

  • L. R. Moolenaar
  • , E. G. M. van Geffen
  • , S. J. A. Hazen
  • , T. C. Sluckin
  • , G. L. Beets
  • , J. W. A. Leijtens
  • , A. K. Talsma
  • , J. H. W. de Wilt
  • , P. J. Tanis
  • , M. Kusters
  • , R. Hompes*
  • , J. B. Tuynman
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Screening has increased the incidence of early-stage rectal cancer and interest in rectal-preserving treatment strategies. Although guidelines recommend completion total mesorectal excision (cTME) in the presence of histological risk factor(s) after local excision, surgery-related morbidity often deters patients from cTME. Additionally, locoregional recurrences (LR) identified during surveillance may still be salvageable. This study evaluates oncological and surgical outcomes in pT1-2 rectal cancer patients who received local excision with or without additional therapy. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional national cohort study was conducted in 67 Dutch hospitals, including all patients who underwent curative surgical resection for rectal cancer in 2016. Patients with pT1-2 tumours who received surveillance, cTME or adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after local excision were selected. The primary outcome was LR. Secondary endpoints included ostomy rate, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Of 3057 patients, 219 underwent local excision, followed by surveillance in 74 % (n = 162), cTME in 23 % (n = 51), and adjuvant (chemo)radiation in 3 % (n = 6). Median follow-up was 46 months (IQR 29-54). Fouryear LR rates were 14 % and 4 % after surveillance and cTME, respectively (p = 0.033). In the surveillance group, 16 of 20 patients (80 %) who developed LR were treated with curative intent. cTME resulted in a substantially higher ostomy rate (43 % vs 4 %, p = 0.001). No significant differences were found in 4-year DFS and OS. Conclusion: Despite a LR rate of 14 % after local excision alone, the majority of these recurrences could be treated with curative intent. Additionally, the risk of stoma was 10-fold lower after surveillance compared to cTME. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT05539417, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NC T05539417.
Original languageEnglish
Article number109623
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume51
Issue number6
Early online date1 Feb 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2025

Keywords

  • Early rectal cancer
  • Local excision
  • Surveillance
  • Completion TME
  • Snapshot study
  • TRANSANAL ENDOSCOPIC MICROSURGERY
  • SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES
  • RADICAL SURGERY
  • T1
  • CHEMORADIOTHERAPY
  • MANAGEMENT
  • RESECTION
  • TRIAL
  • GUIDELINES
  • SOCIETY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Salvageable locoregional recurrence and stoma rate after local excision of pT1-2 rectal cancer - A nationwide cross-sectional cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this