Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Safety and Efficacy of PCSK9 Inhibitors in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Who Underwent Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts: A Comparative Retrospective Analysis

  • Giuseppe Nasso*
  • , Claudio Larosa
  • , Francesco Bartolomucci
  • , Mario Siro Brigiani
  • , Gaetano Contegiacomo
  • , Maria Antonietta Demola
  • , Walter Vignaroli
  • , Alessandra Tripoli
  • , Cataldo Girasoli
  • , Rosanna Lisco
  • , Marialisa Trivigno
  • , Roberto Michele Tunzi
  • , Tommaso Loizzo
  • , Dritan Hila
  • , Rosalba Franchino
  • , Vincenzo Amodeo
  • , Simone Ventra
  • , Giuseppe Diaferia
  • , Giacomo Schinco
  • , Felice Eugenio Agrò
  • Maddalena Zingaro, Isabella Rosa, Roberto Lorusso, Armando Del Prete, Giuseppe Santarpino, Giuseppe Speziale
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

. The in-hospital reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is recommended in the current clinical guidelines. However, the efficacy of proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors in those patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) has never been demonstrated. . From January 2022 to July 2023, we retrospectively analyzed 74 ACS patients characterized by higher LDL-C levels than guideline targets and who underwent coronary bypass surgery. In the first period (January 2022-January 2023), the patients increased their statin dosage and/or added Ezetimibe (Group STEZE, 43 patients). At a later time (February 2023-July 2023), the patients received not only statins and Ezetimibe but also Evolocumab 140 mg every 2 weeks starting as early as possible (Group STEVO, 31 patients). After one and three months post-discharge, the patients underwent clinical and laboratory controls with an evaluation of the efficacy lipid measurements and every adverse event. . The two groups did not differ in terms of preoperative risk factors and Euroscore II (STEVO: 2.14 ± 0.75 vs. STEZE: 2.05 ± 0.6, = 0.29). Also, there was no difference between the groups in terms of ACS (ST-, Instable angina, or NSTE) and time of symptoms onset regarding total cholesterol, LDL-C, and HDL-C trends from the preprocedural period to 3-month follow-up, but there was a more significant reduction in LDL-C and total cholesterol in the STEVO group ( = 0.01 and = 0.04, respectively) and no difference in HDL-C rise ( = 0.12). No deaths were reported. In three STEZE group patients, angina recurrence posed the need for percutaneous re-revascularization. No STEVO patients developed significant adverse events. The statistical difference in these serious events, 7% in STEZE vs. 0% in STEVO, was not significant ( = 0.26). . Evolocumab initiated "as soon as possible" in ACS patients submitted to CABG with high-intensity statin therapy and Ezetimibe was well tolerated and resulted in a substantial and significant reduction in LDL-C levels at discharge, 1 month, and 3 months. This result is associated with a reduction but without a statistical difference between groups.
Original languageEnglish
Article number907
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Feb 2024

Keywords

  • acute coronary syndrome
  • evolocumab
  • revascularization
  • statin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Safety and Efficacy of PCSK9 Inhibitors in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Who Underwent Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts: A Comparative Retrospective Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this