Rule of law or rule of no-one? Bypassing listing procedures through de-centralised de-banking and de-funding practices

Martina Di Gaetano*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademic

Abstract

Over the last decade, the issue of respect of the rule of law by some EU Member States has been constantly debated. Much less has been said about the compatibility with such a value of some areas of the EU’s action. The EU’s approach against terrorism financing and money laundering deserves particular attention in this regard, given its cross-border nature and its impact on individuals. While EU law provides for specific rules as to formal counterterrorism procedures, over the years, several de-centralised practices have emerged that run the risk of watering down the respect of affected persons’ guarantees. This chapter provides a comparative analysis between listing procedures and de-centralised practices. While it concludes that the latter do not allow for a comparable level of respect of basic fair trial guarantees, the chapter also provides a set of recommendations aimed at ensuring similar levels of safeguard are guaranteed.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEnhancing the Rule of Law in the European Union's External Action
Editors Luis M. Hinojosa-Martínez, Carmela Pérez-Bernárdez
Place of PublicationCheltenham / Northampton
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Chapter8
Pages162-185
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic)9781035312320
ISBN (Print)9781035312313
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jul 2023

Keywords

  • EU sanctions
  • counterterrorism financing
  • de-risking
  • civic space
  • Rule of law guarantees

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rule of law or rule of no-one? Bypassing listing procedures through de-centralised de-banking and de-funding practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this