Abstract
Almost all empirical research that has attempted to assess the validity of the Porter hypothesis (PH) has started from reduced-form models, for example, single-equation models for estimating the contribution of environmental regulation to productivity. This paper follows a structural approach that allows testing what is known in the literature as the 'weak' and the 'strong' version of the PH. Our 'Green Innovation' model includes three types of eco-investments to explain differences in the incidence of two types of eco-innovation, which are allowed to affect labor productivity. We allow for complementarity between the two types of eco-innovations. Using a comprehensive panel of Dutch manufacturing firm-level data we estimate the relative importance of environmental regulations on eco-investment and eco-innovations. The results of our analysis show a strong corroboration of the weak and a nuanced corroboration of the strong version of the PH.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 63-77 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Economics of Innovation and New Technology |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 1-2 |
Early online date | 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 17 Feb 2017 |
JEL classifications
- o32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
Keywords
- complementarity
- environmental regulation
- Green innovation
- Porter hypothesis
- productivity
- ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY
- TECHNICAL CHANGE
- PRODUCTIVITY