Revision of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: success or failure?

G.H.E.J. Vijgen*, R. Schouten, L. Pelzers, J.W. Greve, S.H. van Helden, N.D. Bouvy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is a safe and frequently performed bariatric procedure. Unfortunately, re-operations are often necessary. Reports on the success of revisional procedures are scarce and show variable results, either supporting or declining the idea of revising LAGB. This study describes a large cohort of re-operations after failed LAGB to determine the success of revision. METHODS: By use of a prospective cohort, all LAGB revisions performed between 1996 and 2008 were identified. From 301 primary LAGB procedures in our centre, 43 patients (14.3%) required a band revision. In addition, 51 patients were referred from other centres. Our analysis included in total 94 patients with a mean follow-up period of 38 months after revision. RESULTS: Revision was mainly necessary due to anterior slippage (46%) and symmetrical pouch dilatation (36%), which could be resolved by replacing (70%) or refixating the band (27%). Weight loss significantly increased after revision (excess BMI loss (EBMIL), 37.2 +/- 36.3% versus 47.5 +/- 30.4%, P < 0.05). After revision, 23 patients (24%) needed a second re-operation. Patients converted to other procedures (16%) during the second re-operation showed larger weight loss than the revised group (EBMIL, 64.3 +/- 28.1% versus 44.3 +/- 28.7%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We report on a large cohort of LAGB revisions with 38 months of follow-up. Revision of failed LAGB by either refixation or replacement of the band is successful and further increases weight loss.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)287-92
JournalObesity Surgery
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012


Dive into the research topics of 'Revision of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: success or failure?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this