Rethinking the effect of risk aversion on the benefits of service innovations in public administration agencies

N.A. Torugsa*, A. Arundel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This study applies a holistic approach grounded in configurational theory to a sample of 2505 innovative public administration agencies in Europe to explore the effect of organizational risk aversion on the benefits from service innovations, The analyses, using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), identify several combinations of strategies (varying by the agency size and the novelty of innovation) that managers in risk-averse agencies can use to work effectively around the risks of innovating. The findings show that the managers of both high and low risk-averse agencies can achieve high benefits from their innovation efforts, but their strategizing behaviors differ. An integrated strategy that combines collaboration, complementary process and communication innovations, and an active management strategy to support innovation is the most effective method for 'low-risk-averse' small agencies and 'high-risk averse' larger agencies to obtain high benefits from either novel or incremental service innovations. Our results point to the need to rethink the conventional assumption that a culture of risk aversion in public sector agencies is a cause of management ineffectiveness and a stumbling block to innovation success. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)900-910
Number of pages11
JournalResearch Policy
Volume46
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

JEL classifications

  • o32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

Keywords

  • Configurational theory
  • Innovation benefits
  • Public services
  • Risk aversion
  • Service innovations
  • Strategies
  • Innovation
  • Managers
  • Risk analysis
  • Risk assessment
  • Risk perception
  • Service innovation
  • Public administration
  • GOVERNANCE
  • SECTOR
  • POLICY
  • TOO
  • ORGANIZATIONS

Cite this