Rethinking party system nationalization in India (1952-2014)

A.H. Schakel, W. Swenden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article provides a new conceptual and empirical analysis of party system nationalization, based on four different measurements. Unlike previous nationalization studies, these measurements conceptualize party system nationalization on the basis of electoral performance in national (general or federal) and sub-national (state) elections. After introducing these measurements we apply them to 16 general and 351 state elections in India, the world's largest democracy with strong sub-national governments. By incorporating state election results we are able to demonstrate that: (1) the pattern of denationalization in India has been more gradual than assumed in previous studies of party system nationalization; (2) denationalization in recent decades results less from dual voting (vote shifting between state and federal elections) than from the growing divergence among state party systems (in state and federal elections); (3) the 2014 general election result, although potentially transformative in the long run, provides more evidence of continuity than change in the short run.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-25
Number of pages25
JournalGovernment and Opposition
Volume53
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2018

Keywords

  • Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
  • GOVERNMENTS
  • India
  • general elections
  • party system nationalization
  • sub-national elections

Cite this

@article{f0ce2806dbbc45bda25e529f020a59e1,
title = "Rethinking party system nationalization in India (1952-2014)",
abstract = "This article provides a new conceptual and empirical analysis of party system nationalization, based on four different measurements. Unlike previous nationalization studies, these measurements conceptualize party system nationalization on the basis of electoral performance in national (general or federal) and sub-national (state) elections. After introducing these measurements we apply them to 16 general and 351 state elections in India, the world's largest democracy with strong sub-national governments. By incorporating state election results we are able to demonstrate that: (1) the pattern of denationalization in India has been more gradual than assumed in previous studies of party system nationalization; (2) denationalization in recent decades results less from dual voting (vote shifting between state and federal elections) than from the growing divergence among state party systems (in state and federal elections); (3) the 2014 general election result, although potentially transformative in the long run, provides more evidence of continuity than change in the short run.",
keywords = "Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), GOVERNMENTS, India, general elections, party system nationalization, sub-national elections",
author = "A.H. Schakel and W. Swenden",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1017/gov.2015.42",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "1--25",
journal = "Government and Opposition",
issn = "0017-257X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Rethinking party system nationalization in India (1952-2014). / Schakel, A.H.; Swenden, W.

In: Government and Opposition, Vol. 53, No. 1, 01.2018, p. 1-25.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rethinking party system nationalization in India (1952-2014)

AU - Schakel, A.H.

AU - Swenden, W.

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - This article provides a new conceptual and empirical analysis of party system nationalization, based on four different measurements. Unlike previous nationalization studies, these measurements conceptualize party system nationalization on the basis of electoral performance in national (general or federal) and sub-national (state) elections. After introducing these measurements we apply them to 16 general and 351 state elections in India, the world's largest democracy with strong sub-national governments. By incorporating state election results we are able to demonstrate that: (1) the pattern of denationalization in India has been more gradual than assumed in previous studies of party system nationalization; (2) denationalization in recent decades results less from dual voting (vote shifting between state and federal elections) than from the growing divergence among state party systems (in state and federal elections); (3) the 2014 general election result, although potentially transformative in the long run, provides more evidence of continuity than change in the short run.

AB - This article provides a new conceptual and empirical analysis of party system nationalization, based on four different measurements. Unlike previous nationalization studies, these measurements conceptualize party system nationalization on the basis of electoral performance in national (general or federal) and sub-national (state) elections. After introducing these measurements we apply them to 16 general and 351 state elections in India, the world's largest democracy with strong sub-national governments. By incorporating state election results we are able to demonstrate that: (1) the pattern of denationalization in India has been more gradual than assumed in previous studies of party system nationalization; (2) denationalization in recent decades results less from dual voting (vote shifting between state and federal elections) than from the growing divergence among state party systems (in state and federal elections); (3) the 2014 general election result, although potentially transformative in the long run, provides more evidence of continuity than change in the short run.

KW - Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)

KW - GOVERNMENTS

KW - India

KW - general elections

KW - party system nationalization

KW - sub-national elections

U2 - 10.1017/gov.2015.42

DO - 10.1017/gov.2015.42

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 1

EP - 25

JO - Government and Opposition

JF - Government and Opposition

SN - 0017-257X

IS - 1

ER -