Rethinking Jus Cogens after Germany v. Italy: Back to Article 53?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Article 53 of the vienna convention on the law of treaties provides that a treaty is void if it conflicts with jus cogens. It is theoretically possible that two or more states would conclude such a treaty, yet this is not very likely in practice. The question thus arises how jus cogens operates outside of article 53 situations and outside of treaty law in general. A ‘trumping effect’ of jus cogens over all other norms of international law has been proposed in some writings and judicial decisions. Such views have been shattered by the icj, most recently (but not exclusively) in germany v. Italy. Jus cogens seems to be back to article 53 and its (rather theoretical) voiding powers. Considering the latest judicial decisions, this article aims to place jus cogens within the international legal system. It demonstrates that jus cogens is not a futile concept; but it is wrong to see it as a trump card.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-27
JournalNetherlands International Law Review
Volume60
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{16d608718af64e0aa66516dd0738fd83,
title = "Rethinking Jus Cogens after Germany v. Italy: Back to Article 53?",
abstract = "Article 53 of the vienna convention on the law of treaties provides that a treaty is void if it conflicts with jus cogens. It is theoretically possible that two or more states would conclude such a treaty, yet this is not very likely in practice. The question thus arises how jus cogens operates outside of article 53 situations and outside of treaty law in general. A ‘trumping effect’ of jus cogens over all other norms of international law has been proposed in some writings and judicial decisions. Such views have been shattered by the icj, most recently (but not exclusively) in germany v. Italy. Jus cogens seems to be back to article 53 and its (rather theoretical) voiding powers. Considering the latest judicial decisions, this article aims to place jus cogens within the international legal system. It demonstrates that jus cogens is not a futile concept; but it is wrong to see it as a trump card.",
author = "Jure Vidmar",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1017/S0165070X12001015",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "1--27",
journal = "Netherlands International Law Review",
issn = "0165-070X",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

Rethinking Jus Cogens after Germany v. Italy : Back to Article 53? / Vidmar, Jure.

In: Netherlands International Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 1, 2013, p. 1-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rethinking Jus Cogens after Germany v. Italy

T2 - Back to Article 53?

AU - Vidmar, Jure

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Article 53 of the vienna convention on the law of treaties provides that a treaty is void if it conflicts with jus cogens. It is theoretically possible that two or more states would conclude such a treaty, yet this is not very likely in practice. The question thus arises how jus cogens operates outside of article 53 situations and outside of treaty law in general. A ‘trumping effect’ of jus cogens over all other norms of international law has been proposed in some writings and judicial decisions. Such views have been shattered by the icj, most recently (but not exclusively) in germany v. Italy. Jus cogens seems to be back to article 53 and its (rather theoretical) voiding powers. Considering the latest judicial decisions, this article aims to place jus cogens within the international legal system. It demonstrates that jus cogens is not a futile concept; but it is wrong to see it as a trump card.

AB - Article 53 of the vienna convention on the law of treaties provides that a treaty is void if it conflicts with jus cogens. It is theoretically possible that two or more states would conclude such a treaty, yet this is not very likely in practice. The question thus arises how jus cogens operates outside of article 53 situations and outside of treaty law in general. A ‘trumping effect’ of jus cogens over all other norms of international law has been proposed in some writings and judicial decisions. Such views have been shattered by the icj, most recently (but not exclusively) in germany v. Italy. Jus cogens seems to be back to article 53 and its (rather theoretical) voiding powers. Considering the latest judicial decisions, this article aims to place jus cogens within the international legal system. It demonstrates that jus cogens is not a futile concept; but it is wrong to see it as a trump card.

U2 - 10.1017/S0165070X12001015

DO - 10.1017/S0165070X12001015

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 1

EP - 27

JO - Netherlands International Law Review

JF - Netherlands International Law Review

SN - 0165-070X

IS - 1

ER -