Responses to dominance challenge are a function of psychopathy level: A multimethod study

Jill Lobbestael, Arnoud Arntz, Marisol Voncken, Michael Potegal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This study assesses the relationship between psychopathy and dominance, both as a trait level and in 2 interpersonal contexts. Following the interpersonal circumplex model, we expected that interacting with a dominant interviewer would reduce dominance displays by low psychopathy participants (interpersonal complementarity) but might increase such displays in those with higher psychopathy (anticomplementarity). Psychopathic traits and dominance were assessed in a community sample (N = 91) using multiple dominance indicators: self-reported overall dominance level, job preference, dominance displays observed during identical interviews with a subordinate and dominant interviewer, and baseline and postinterview measures of personal space and testosterone level. Psychopathic traits were positively related to dominance on both trait measures and in the interviews. As a trait, higher self-reported psychopathy scores were associated with higher levels of self-reported dominance and preference for supervisory job positions. Higher Factor 1 psychopathy scores were associated with increased dominance display in interaction with the dominant interviewer. Higher Factor 2 scores were associated with allowing the dominant interviewer to approach more closely (reduced physical distancing). Psychopathy was partly related to a delayed increase in testosterone levels after interaction. Psychopathic traits may include a general tendency to dominate, a tendency which increases when interacting with a dominant other. The emotional/interpersonal psychopathy factor is specifically related to increased dominance displays when interacting with a dominant individual, while the behavioral factor of psychopathy is related to reduced physical distancing of a dominant partner. At higher psychopathy levels the general rule of dominant-subordinate reciprocity during social interaction is reversed. (PsycINFO Database Record

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)305-314
Number of pages10
JournalPersonality Disorders-Theory Research and Treatment
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018

Keywords

  • psychopathy
  • dominance
  • interpersonal behavior
  • personal space
  • testosterone
  • ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY-DISORDER
  • CRITERION-RELATED VALIDITY
  • IMPLICIT POWER MOTIVATION
  • INTERPERSONAL-BEHAVIOR
  • TESTOSTERONE CHANGES
  • NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR
  • SEX-DIFFERENCES
  • DARK TRIAD
  • AGGRESSION
  • INVENTORY

Cite this

@article{7aeb4db3e08645d4a555112c82847818,
title = "Responses to dominance challenge are a function of psychopathy level: A multimethod study",
abstract = "This study assesses the relationship between psychopathy and dominance, both as a trait level and in 2 interpersonal contexts. Following the interpersonal circumplex model, we expected that interacting with a dominant interviewer would reduce dominance displays by low psychopathy participants (interpersonal complementarity) but might increase such displays in those with higher psychopathy (anticomplementarity). Psychopathic traits and dominance were assessed in a community sample (N = 91) using multiple dominance indicators: self-reported overall dominance level, job preference, dominance displays observed during identical interviews with a subordinate and dominant interviewer, and baseline and postinterview measures of personal space and testosterone level. Psychopathic traits were positively related to dominance on both trait measures and in the interviews. As a trait, higher self-reported psychopathy scores were associated with higher levels of self-reported dominance and preference for supervisory job positions. Higher Factor 1 psychopathy scores were associated with increased dominance display in interaction with the dominant interviewer. Higher Factor 2 scores were associated with allowing the dominant interviewer to approach more closely (reduced physical distancing). Psychopathy was partly related to a delayed increase in testosterone levels after interaction. Psychopathic traits may include a general tendency to dominate, a tendency which increases when interacting with a dominant other. The emotional/interpersonal psychopathy factor is specifically related to increased dominance displays when interacting with a dominant individual, while the behavioral factor of psychopathy is related to reduced physical distancing of a dominant partner. At higher psychopathy levels the general rule of dominant-subordinate reciprocity during social interaction is reversed. (PsycINFO Database Record",
keywords = "psychopathy, dominance, interpersonal behavior, personal space, testosterone, ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY-DISORDER, CRITERION-RELATED VALIDITY, IMPLICIT POWER MOTIVATION, INTERPERSONAL-BEHAVIOR, TESTOSTERONE CHANGES, NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR, SEX-DIFFERENCES, DARK TRIAD, AGGRESSION, INVENTORY",
author = "Jill Lobbestael and Arnoud Arntz and Marisol Voncken and Michael Potegal",
note = "(c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1037/per0000252",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "305--314",
journal = "Personality Disorders-Theory Research and Treatment",
issn = "1949-2715",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "4",

}

Responses to dominance challenge are a function of psychopathy level : A multimethod study. / Lobbestael, Jill; Arntz, Arnoud; Voncken, Marisol; Potegal, Michael.

In: Personality Disorders-Theory Research and Treatment, Vol. 9, No. 4, 07.2018, p. 305-314.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responses to dominance challenge are a function of psychopathy level

T2 - A multimethod study

AU - Lobbestael, Jill

AU - Arntz, Arnoud

AU - Voncken, Marisol

AU - Potegal, Michael

N1 - (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

PY - 2018/7

Y1 - 2018/7

N2 - This study assesses the relationship between psychopathy and dominance, both as a trait level and in 2 interpersonal contexts. Following the interpersonal circumplex model, we expected that interacting with a dominant interviewer would reduce dominance displays by low psychopathy participants (interpersonal complementarity) but might increase such displays in those with higher psychopathy (anticomplementarity). Psychopathic traits and dominance were assessed in a community sample (N = 91) using multiple dominance indicators: self-reported overall dominance level, job preference, dominance displays observed during identical interviews with a subordinate and dominant interviewer, and baseline and postinterview measures of personal space and testosterone level. Psychopathic traits were positively related to dominance on both trait measures and in the interviews. As a trait, higher self-reported psychopathy scores were associated with higher levels of self-reported dominance and preference for supervisory job positions. Higher Factor 1 psychopathy scores were associated with increased dominance display in interaction with the dominant interviewer. Higher Factor 2 scores were associated with allowing the dominant interviewer to approach more closely (reduced physical distancing). Psychopathy was partly related to a delayed increase in testosterone levels after interaction. Psychopathic traits may include a general tendency to dominate, a tendency which increases when interacting with a dominant other. The emotional/interpersonal psychopathy factor is specifically related to increased dominance displays when interacting with a dominant individual, while the behavioral factor of psychopathy is related to reduced physical distancing of a dominant partner. At higher psychopathy levels the general rule of dominant-subordinate reciprocity during social interaction is reversed. (PsycINFO Database Record

AB - This study assesses the relationship between psychopathy and dominance, both as a trait level and in 2 interpersonal contexts. Following the interpersonal circumplex model, we expected that interacting with a dominant interviewer would reduce dominance displays by low psychopathy participants (interpersonal complementarity) but might increase such displays in those with higher psychopathy (anticomplementarity). Psychopathic traits and dominance were assessed in a community sample (N = 91) using multiple dominance indicators: self-reported overall dominance level, job preference, dominance displays observed during identical interviews with a subordinate and dominant interviewer, and baseline and postinterview measures of personal space and testosterone level. Psychopathic traits were positively related to dominance on both trait measures and in the interviews. As a trait, higher self-reported psychopathy scores were associated with higher levels of self-reported dominance and preference for supervisory job positions. Higher Factor 1 psychopathy scores were associated with increased dominance display in interaction with the dominant interviewer. Higher Factor 2 scores were associated with allowing the dominant interviewer to approach more closely (reduced physical distancing). Psychopathy was partly related to a delayed increase in testosterone levels after interaction. Psychopathic traits may include a general tendency to dominate, a tendency which increases when interacting with a dominant other. The emotional/interpersonal psychopathy factor is specifically related to increased dominance displays when interacting with a dominant individual, while the behavioral factor of psychopathy is related to reduced physical distancing of a dominant partner. At higher psychopathy levels the general rule of dominant-subordinate reciprocity during social interaction is reversed. (PsycINFO Database Record

KW - psychopathy

KW - dominance

KW - interpersonal behavior

KW - personal space

KW - testosterone

KW - ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY-DISORDER

KW - CRITERION-RELATED VALIDITY

KW - IMPLICIT POWER MOTIVATION

KW - INTERPERSONAL-BEHAVIOR

KW - TESTOSTERONE CHANGES

KW - NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR

KW - SEX-DIFFERENCES

KW - DARK TRIAD

KW - AGGRESSION

KW - INVENTORY

U2 - 10.1037/per0000252

DO - 10.1037/per0000252

M3 - Article

C2 - 28627902

VL - 9

SP - 305

EP - 314

JO - Personality Disorders-Theory Research and Treatment

JF - Personality Disorders-Theory Research and Treatment

SN - 1949-2715

IS - 4

ER -