Response to Comment on: The penoscrotal approach is a viable alternative to the perineal approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation: A retrospective cohort study

Alexander van Renterghem; Lien Verbeke; Helene De Bruyn; Caroline Jamaer; Evert Baten; Koenraad van Renterghem

doi:10.1038/s41443-026-01248-1

Response to Comment on: The penoscrotal approach is a viable alternative to the perineal approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation: A retrospective cohort study

Alexander van Renterghem^*
, Lien Verbeke
, Helene De Bruyn
, Caroline Jamaer
, Evert Baten
, Koenraad van Renterghem^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › Academic › peer-review

Original language	English
Number of pages	2
Journal	International Journal of Impotence Research
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-026-01248-1
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 1 Mar 2026

Keywords

CUFF EROSION

Access to Document

10.1038/s41443-026-01248-1

Cite this

van Renterghem, A., Verbeke, L., De Bruyn, H., Jamaer, C., Baten, E., & van Renterghem, K. (2026). Response to Comment on: The penoscrotal approach is a viable alternative to the perineal approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation: A retrospective cohort study. International Journal of Impotence Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-026-01248-1

@article{24c3fd250f7144bfa86432959cc86317,

title = "Response to Comment on: The penoscrotal approach is a viable alternative to the perineal approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation: A retrospective cohort study",

keywords = "CUFF EROSION",

author = "\{van Renterghem\}, Alexander and Lien Verbeke and \{De Bruyn\}, Helene and Caroline Jamaer and Evert Baten and \{van Renterghem\}, Koenraad",

year = "2026",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1038/s41443-026-01248-1",

language = "English",

journal = "International Journal of Impotence Research",

issn = "0955-9930",

publisher = "Springer",

}

Response to Comment on: The penoscrotal approach is a viable alternative to the perineal approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation: A retrospective cohort study. / van Renterghem, Alexander; Verbeke, Lien; De Bruyn, Helene et al.
In: International Journal of Impotence Research, 01.03.2026.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to Comment on: The penoscrotal approach is a viable alternative to the perineal approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation

T2 - A retrospective cohort study

AU - van Renterghem, Alexander

AU - Verbeke, Lien

AU - De Bruyn, Helene

AU - Jamaer, Caroline

AU - Baten, Evert

AU - van Renterghem, Koenraad

PY - 2026/3/1

Y1 - 2026/3/1

KW - CUFF EROSION

U2 - 10.1038/s41443-026-01248-1

DO - 10.1038/s41443-026-01248-1

M3 - Editorial

SN - 0955-9930

JO - International Journal of Impotence Research

JF - International Journal of Impotence Research

ER -