Resolving conflicts in European fundamental rights protection: National and European courts’ perspectives

Research output: ThesisDoctoral ThesisInternal

152 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Conflicts between EU law and the ECHR have become more frequent in recent years. This research examines different ways for national courts to deal with and overcome those conflicts and argues that Article 52(3) of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights can be seen as a conflict rule. It states that the rights guaranteed by the Charter are to have the same meaning and scope as corresponding ECHR rights, including the extent to which they can be limited. In case of a conflict between EU law and the ECHR, the minimum level of protection, as required under the ECHR system, should be respected.
Original languageEnglish
Awarding Institution
  • Maastricht University
  • Universiteit Hasselt
Supervisors/Advisors
  • Claes, Monica, Supervisor
  • Foubert, P., Supervisor
Award date12 Dec 2018
Place of PublicationMaastricht
Publisher
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Cite this

@phdthesis{f69bcf3cca354d5c8384e0e4a07dcc19,
title = "Resolving conflicts in European fundamental rights protection: National and European courts’ perspectives",
abstract = "Conflicts between EU law and the ECHR have become more frequent in recent years. This research examines different ways for national courts to deal with and overcome those conflicts and argues that Article 52(3) of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights can be seen as a conflict rule. It states that the rights guaranteed by the Charter are to have the same meaning and scope as corresponding ECHR rights, including the extent to which they can be limited. In case of a conflict between EU law and the ECHR, the minimum level of protection, as required under the ECHR system, should be respected.",
author = "Sejla Imamovic",
note = "Double doctoral degree Hasselt University - UM",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.26481/dis.20181212si",
language = "English",
publisher = "Maastricht University",
school = "Maastricht University, Universiteit Hasselt",

}

Resolving conflicts in European fundamental rights protection : National and European courts’ perspectives . / Imamovic, Sejla.

Maastricht : Maastricht University, 2018. 399 p.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral ThesisInternal

TY - THES

T1 - Resolving conflicts in European fundamental rights protection

T2 - National and European courts’ perspectives

AU - Imamovic, Sejla

N1 - Double doctoral degree Hasselt University - UM

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Conflicts between EU law and the ECHR have become more frequent in recent years. This research examines different ways for national courts to deal with and overcome those conflicts and argues that Article 52(3) of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights can be seen as a conflict rule. It states that the rights guaranteed by the Charter are to have the same meaning and scope as corresponding ECHR rights, including the extent to which they can be limited. In case of a conflict between EU law and the ECHR, the minimum level of protection, as required under the ECHR system, should be respected.

AB - Conflicts between EU law and the ECHR have become more frequent in recent years. This research examines different ways for national courts to deal with and overcome those conflicts and argues that Article 52(3) of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights can be seen as a conflict rule. It states that the rights guaranteed by the Charter are to have the same meaning and scope as corresponding ECHR rights, including the extent to which they can be limited. In case of a conflict between EU law and the ECHR, the minimum level of protection, as required under the ECHR system, should be respected.

U2 - 10.26481/dis.20181212si

DO - 10.26481/dis.20181212si

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

PB - Maastricht University

CY - Maastricht

ER -