TY - JOUR
T1 - Resilience to affective disorders: A comparative validation of two resilience scales
AU - Leontjevas, Ruslan
AU - de Beek, Wendie Op
AU - Lataster, Johan
AU - Jacobs, Nele
PY - 2014/10/15
Y1 - 2014/10/15
N2 - Background: Resilience to affective disorders in rehabilitating patients or in individuals with a severe disability is of special research interest. However, there is no gold standard for measuring resilience. We aimed to test the accuracy of the Dutch translation of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRSal) and of the Resilience Scale (RSal) in recognizing rehabilitating patients without anxiety and depression, and to determine the reliability and construct validity of both scales. Methods: A within-subjects longitudinal study with six assessments, each one week apart. Forty residents of a nursing home rehabilitating unit were interviewed to assess resilience (BRSnl and RSal), optimism and pessimism (LOT-R), depression and anxiety (HADS), positive and negative affect (PANAS), and pain (VAS). Results: Receiver operating characteristic analyses for recognizing the absence of depression and anxiety (DADS score <7) revealed better accuracy (P=0.038) for the BRSnl (AUC=0.84; p
AB - Background: Resilience to affective disorders in rehabilitating patients or in individuals with a severe disability is of special research interest. However, there is no gold standard for measuring resilience. We aimed to test the accuracy of the Dutch translation of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRSal) and of the Resilience Scale (RSal) in recognizing rehabilitating patients without anxiety and depression, and to determine the reliability and construct validity of both scales. Methods: A within-subjects longitudinal study with six assessments, each one week apart. Forty residents of a nursing home rehabilitating unit were interviewed to assess resilience (BRSnl and RSal), optimism and pessimism (LOT-R), depression and anxiety (HADS), positive and negative affect (PANAS), and pain (VAS). Results: Receiver operating characteristic analyses for recognizing the absence of depression and anxiety (DADS score <7) revealed better accuracy (P=0.038) for the BRSnl (AUC=0.84; p
KW - Anxiety/anxiety disorders
KW - Assessment/diagnosis
KW - Depression
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Resilience
U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2014.07.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2014.07.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 25069081
SN - 0165-0327
VL - 168
SP - 262
EP - 268
JO - Journal of Affective Disorders
JF - Journal of Affective Disorders
ER -