Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of the Phillips-checklist, a proposed framework for the quality assessment of modeling studies. Six raters evaluated nine modeling studies from three different medical specialties. Intra-class correlation (ICC) and corresponding variance components were estimated from these studies. Raters were asked to comment on their experience with the framework. While overall the mean inter-rater reliability showed no significant rater-effect (ICC=0.69, p=0.064), there was - presumably as a result of a lower study variability - a significant rater effect for clopidogrel only (p
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 619-627 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 17 Dec 2015 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2016 |
Keywords
- Inter-rater reliability
- methodological assessment
- modeling studies
- intra class-correlation
- cost-effectiveness
- MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER
- COST-EFFECTIVENESS
- ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS
- TASK-FORCE
- INSULIN GLARGINE
- GUIDELINES
- CLOPIDOGREL
- QUALITY
- UK
- RECOMMENDATIONS
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reporting health care decision models: a prospective reliability study of a multidimensional evaluation framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver