Reporting health care decision models: a prospective reliability study of a multidimensional evaluation framework

D. Müller, A. Gerber-Grote, B. Stollenwerk, S. Stock, P.W. Auweiler, S. Frey, C.C. Adarkwah, R.J. de Kinderen, M. Hellmich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of the Phillips-checklist, a proposed framework for the quality assessment of modeling studies. Six raters evaluated nine modeling studies from three different medical specialties. Intra-class correlation (ICC) and corresponding variance components were estimated from these studies. Raters were asked to comment on their experience with the framework. While overall the mean inter-rater reliability showed no significant rater-effect (ICC=0.69, p=0.064), there was - presumably as a result of a lower study variability - a significant rater effect for clopidogrel only (p

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)619-627
Number of pages9
JournalExpert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Volume16
Issue number5
Early online date17 Dec 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2016

Keywords

  • Inter-rater reliability
  • methodological assessment
  • modeling studies
  • intra class-correlation
  • cost-effectiveness
  • MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER
  • COST-EFFECTIVENESS
  • ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS
  • TASK-FORCE
  • INSULIN GLARGINE
  • GUIDELINES
  • CLOPIDOGREL
  • QUALITY
  • UK
  • RECOMMENDATIONS

Cite this