Reply to 'Radiomics Quality Score 2.0: what changed from version 1.0 and why it matters'

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

Original language	English
Article number	86
Number of pages	1
Journal	Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
Volume	23
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-025-01096-w
Publication status	Published - Jan 2026

Access to Document

@article{22414ae55a79430b8ae9ff721fcdb2d0,

title = "Reply to 'Radiomics Quality Score 2.0: what changed from version 1.0 and why it matters'",

author = "Philippe Lambin and Zohaib Salahuddin",

year = "2026",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1038/s41571-025-01096-w",

language = "English",

volume = "23",

journal = "Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology",

issn = "1759-4774",

publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to 'Radiomics Quality Score 2.0

T2 - what changed from version 1.0 and why it matters'

AU - Lambin, Philippe

AU - Salahuddin, Zohaib

PY - 2026/1

Y1 - 2026/1

U2 - 10.1038/s41571-025-01096-w

DO - 10.1038/s41571-025-01096-w

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

SN - 1759-4774

VL - 23

JO - Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

JF - Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

IS - 1

M1 - 86

ER -