Replicatie en de organisatie van communicatie ten behoeve van wetenschappelijke geloofwaardigheid

Bart Penders

doi:10.5117/TCW2022.3.004.PEND

Replicatie en de organisatie van communicatie ten behoeve van wetenschappelijke geloofwaardigheid

Translated title of the contribution: Replication and the organisation of communication for scientific credibility

Bart Penders^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Monitoring the quality and credibility of scientific claims requires different tools in different epistemic cultures. This paper argues that replication and replication studies are an important organizing principle for communication between scientists, for the benefit of scientific credibility. However, this is not evidently so within every epistemic culture, and there are alternative ways of organising communication with the same goal.

Translated title of the contribution	Replication and the organisation of communication for scientific credibility
Original language	Dutch
Pages (from-to)	193-209
Number of pages	17
Journal	Tijdschrift Voor Communicatiewetenschap
Volume	50
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5117/TCW2022.3.004.PEND
Publication status	Published - 1 Oct 2022

Access to Document

10.5117/TCW2022.3.004.PENDLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{5819362bb1a54880988bd224875d4a67,

title = "Replicatie en de organisatie van communicatie ten behoeve van wetenschappelijke geloofwaardigheid",

abstract = "Monitoring the quality and credibility of scientific claims requires different tools in different epistemic cultures. This paper argues that replication and replication studies are an important organizing principle for communication between scientists, for the benefit of scientific credibility. However, this is not evidently so within every epistemic culture, and there are alternative ways of organising communication with the same goal.",

author = "Bart Penders",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Bart Penders.",

year = "2022",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.5117/TCW2022.3.004.PEND",

language = "Dutch",

volume = "50",

pages = "193--209",

journal = "Tijdschrift Voor Communicatiewetenschap",

issn = "1384-6930",

publisher = "Amsterdam University Press",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Replicatie en de organisatie van communicatie ten behoeve van wetenschappelijke geloofwaardigheid

AU - Penders, Bart

PY - 2022/10/1

Y1 - 2022/10/1

N2 - Monitoring the quality and credibility of scientific claims requires different tools in different epistemic cultures. This paper argues that replication and replication studies are an important organizing principle for communication between scientists, for the benefit of scientific credibility. However, this is not evidently so within every epistemic culture, and there are alternative ways of organising communication with the same goal.

AB - Monitoring the quality and credibility of scientific claims requires different tools in different epistemic cultures. This paper argues that replication and replication studies are an important organizing principle for communication between scientists, for the benefit of scientific credibility. However, this is not evidently so within every epistemic culture, and there are alternative ways of organising communication with the same goal.

U2 - 10.5117/TCW2022.3.004.PEND

DO - 10.5117/TCW2022.3.004.PEND

M3 - Article

SN - 1384-6930

VL - 50

SP - 193

EP - 209

JO - Tijdschrift Voor Communicatiewetenschap

JF - Tijdschrift Voor Communicatiewetenschap

IS - 3

ER -

Replicatie en de organisatie van communicatie ten behoeve van wetenschappelijke geloofwaardigheid

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this