Abstract
Purpose: To compare the repeatability of ocular biometry measured with the LENSTAR LS 900, IOLMaster 700, and Anterion and its impact on predicted intraocular lens (IOL) power.Setting: Tertiary eye-care facility in South India.Design: Prospective, observational, cross-sectional study.Methods: Eyes diagnosed with cataract had 3 consecutive scans on each biometers. The repeatability was assessed using the within-subject standard deviation (S-w), test-retest repeatability, and coefficient of variation (CoV). The agreement was evaluated with the intraclass correlation (ICC). The IOL power was calculated with the Barrett Universal II formula.Results: The study comprised 127 eyes of 76 patients. The repeatability of all parameters for a given device were excellent (ICC >0.9, low CoV and Sw). The agreement of the parameters between the biometers was very good (range from 0.93 to 0.99). The predicted IOL power differed statistically between the devices (P<.05), but the difference was clinically insignificant between the 3 biometers (ICC >0.99 for repeat calculation of IOL power).Conclusions: All the biometers included in the study had good to excellent repeatability of biometry parameters. The agreement of the predicted IOL power was excellent between the 3 optical biometers. (C) 2021 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 585-592 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery |
Volume | 47 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 May 2021 |
Keywords
- LOW-COHERENCE REFLECTOMETRY
- OPTICAL BIOMETRY
- OCULAR BIOMETRY
- AGREEMENT
- INTERFEROMETRY
- FORMULA