Repeatability of biometry measured by three devices and its impact on predicted intraocular lens power

N. Shetty, L. Kaweri, A. Koshy, R. Shetty, R.M.M.A. Nuijts, A.S. Roy*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the repeatability of ocular biometry measured with the LENSTAR LS 900, IOLMaster 700, and Anterion and its impact on predicted intraocular lens (IOL) power.Setting: Tertiary eye-care facility in South India.Design: Prospective, observational, cross-sectional study.Methods: Eyes diagnosed with cataract had 3 consecutive scans on each biometers. The repeatability was assessed using the within-subject standard deviation (S-w), test-retest repeatability, and coefficient of variation (CoV). The agreement was evaluated with the intraclass correlation (ICC). The IOL power was calculated with the Barrett Universal II formula.Results: The study comprised 127 eyes of 76 patients. The repeatability of all parameters for a given device were excellent (ICC >0.9, low CoV and Sw). The agreement of the parameters between the biometers was very good (range from 0.93 to 0.99). The predicted IOL power differed statistically between the devices (P<.05), but the difference was clinically insignificant between the 3 biometers (ICC >0.99 for repeat calculation of IOL power).Conclusions: All the biometers included in the study had good to excellent repeatability of biometry parameters. The agreement of the predicted IOL power was excellent between the 3 optical biometers. (C) 2021 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)585-592
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
Volume47
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2021

Keywords

  • LOW-COHERENCE REFLECTOMETRY
  • OPTICAL BIOMETRY
  • OCULAR BIOMETRY
  • AGREEMENT
  • INTERFEROMETRY
  • FORMULA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Repeatability of biometry measured by three devices and its impact on predicted intraocular lens power'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this