Repairing the efficiency loss due to varying cluster sizes in two-level two-armed randomized trials with heterogeneous clustering

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In two-armed trials with clustered observations the arms may differ in terms of (i) the intraclass correlation, (ii) the outcome variance, (iii) the average cluster size, and (iv) the number of clusters. For a linear mixed model analysis of the treatment effect, this paper examines the expected efficiency loss due to varying cluster sizes based upon the asymptotic relative efficiency of varying versus constant cluster sizes. Simple, but nearly cost-optimal, correction factors are derived for the numbers of clusters to repair this efficiency loss. In an extensive Monte Carlo simulation, the accuracy of the asymptotic relative efficiency and its Taylor approximation are examined for small sample sizes. Practical guidelines are derived to correct the numbers of clusters calculated under constant cluster sizes (within each treatment) when planning a study. Because of the variety of simulation conditions, these guidelines can be considered conservative but safe in many realistic situations. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2000-2015
Number of pages16
JournalStatistics in Medicine
Volume35
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 May 2016

Keywords

  • asymptotic relative efficiency
  • cluster randomized trials
  • individually randomized group treatment
  • therapist effects
  • varying cluster sizes
  • SAMPLE-SIZE
  • STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS
  • MULTILEVEL MODELS
  • GENERAL-PRACTICE
  • CLINICAL-TRIALS
  • PRIMARY-CARE
  • F-TEST
  • DESIGN
  • POWER
  • INTERVENTION

Cite this