Renaming with Purpose: Investor Response and Fund Manager Behavior after ESG Renaming

Kayshani Gibbon, Jeroen Derwall, Dirk Gerritsen, K.G. Koedijk

Research output: Working paper / PreprintDiscussion paper

Abstract

otivated by concerns that mutual funds’ stated integration of environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria in investing is cosmetic, we study the widespread phenomenon that mutual funds change their name to include ESG-related appellations. Using a unique global sample of ESG-related name changes by 740 retail and 317 institutional share classes between July 2016 and September 2022, we investigate investors’ response and fund managers’ behaviour in terms of fund flows, portfolio-level ESG metrics and fees. Using difference-in-differences analyses and accounting for heterogeneous treatment effects, we provide mixed evidence on whether funds increase flows by renaming, although effects appear significant for funds domiciled in Europe. We subsequently document that fund managers do improve the ESG performance, reduce exposure to controversial businesses, decrease the carbon intensity, and lower the overall ESG risks of their portfolios after ESG renaming. Renaming has no material impact on funds’ expenses. The results alleviate concerns that funds use ESG-oriented name changes cosmetically and imply that they are renaming with purpose.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherCEPR
Number of pages79
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jul 2024

Publication series

SeriesCEPR Discussion Paper Series
NumberDP19291

JEL classifications

  • g15 - International Financial Markets
  • g23 - "Pension Funds; Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors"
  • m14 - "Corporate Culture; Social Responsibility"

Keywords

  • ESG
  • mutual funds
  • renaming
  • flows
  • Expenses

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Renaming with Purpose: Investor Response and Fund Manager Behavior after ESG Renaming'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this