TY - JOUR
T1 - Registration of finger implants in the Dutch arthroplasty registry (LROI)
AU - van Santbrink, Esther
AU - van den Hurk, Antonius A.
AU - Spekenbrink-Spooren, Anneke
AU - Hommes, Juliette E.
AU - Schols, Rutger M.
AU - Keuter, Xavier H.A.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank the LROI for enabling this research by providing the necessary data and all surgeons for registering their surgeries to assist this research. The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Since the study uses a registry with anonymized patient data, ethical approval was not applicable.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/9/1
Y1 - 2024/9/1
N2 - Finger arthroplasty is commonly used to treat pain in the finger joints due to osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. Despite the procedure having existed for a relatively long time, it is still unknown which characteristics influence implant survival. The Dutch Arthroplasty Registry (LROI) is one of the 4 registries worldwide registering finger arthroplasties. This study aimed to investigate impact factors for implant survival regarding finger joint arthroplasty and assess registration completeness using the national healthcare claims database to compare. A total of 951 primary arthroplasties and 84 revision arthroplasties of the finger joints were registered. A higher likelihood of primary and revision surgery was found in female patients. The third and fourth proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints were the most frequently operated in primary surgery; however, the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints were the most frequently revised joints. Silicone implants were used in most cases and evenly throughout all digits. Suboptimal registration completeness was shown for plastic surgeons with just 35.5%–37.4% of all surgeries registered. Although orthopedic surgeons do not perform most surgeries on the hand, they registered 76.5%–78.2% of surgeries. No statistical analyses were justified, considering the low completeness and limited follow-up. Female gender and PIP joint disease are possible risk factors for primary arthroplasty. MCP arthroplasties showed higher revision rates. However, participation rates and, therefore, data completeness were not optimal. To optimize participation, improving ease of registration should be explored. Furthermore, we urge readers who deal with joint implants to register their surgeries in the LROI database because only optimal registration completeness leads to high-quality data.
AB - Finger arthroplasty is commonly used to treat pain in the finger joints due to osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. Despite the procedure having existed for a relatively long time, it is still unknown which characteristics influence implant survival. The Dutch Arthroplasty Registry (LROI) is one of the 4 registries worldwide registering finger arthroplasties. This study aimed to investigate impact factors for implant survival regarding finger joint arthroplasty and assess registration completeness using the national healthcare claims database to compare. A total of 951 primary arthroplasties and 84 revision arthroplasties of the finger joints were registered. A higher likelihood of primary and revision surgery was found in female patients. The third and fourth proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints were the most frequently operated in primary surgery; however, the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints were the most frequently revised joints. Silicone implants were used in most cases and evenly throughout all digits. Suboptimal registration completeness was shown for plastic surgeons with just 35.5%–37.4% of all surgeries registered. Although orthopedic surgeons do not perform most surgeries on the hand, they registered 76.5%–78.2% of surgeries. No statistical analyses were justified, considering the low completeness and limited follow-up. Female gender and PIP joint disease are possible risk factors for primary arthroplasty. MCP arthroplasties showed higher revision rates. However, participation rates and, therefore, data completeness were not optimal. To optimize participation, improving ease of registration should be explored. Furthermore, we urge readers who deal with joint implants to register their surgeries in the LROI database because only optimal registration completeness leads to high-quality data.
KW - Arthroplasty registry
KW - Finger arthroplasty
KW - Impact factors
KW - Observational early outcomes
KW - Orthopedic and plastic surgery
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.05.006
DO - 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.05.006
M3 - Article
SN - 2352-5878
VL - 41
SP - 215
EP - 224
JO - JPRAS Open
JF - JPRAS Open
ER -