Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Regional antibiotic delivery for sternal wound infection prophylaxis a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • Mariusz Kowalewski*
  • , Michalina M Kolodziejczak
  • , Tomasz Urbanowicz
  • , Maria Elena De Piero
  • , Silvia Mariani
  • , Michal Pasierski
  • , Maged Makhoul
  • , Maria Comanici
  • , Emil Julian Dabrowski
  • , Matteo Matteucci
  • , Giulio Massimi
  • , Radoslaw Litwinowicz
  • , Adam Kowalówka
  • , Wojciech Wanha
  • , Federica Jiritano
  • , Gennaro Martucci
  • , Giuseppe Maria Raffa
  • , Pietro Giorgio Malvindi
  • , Lukasz Kuzma
  • , Piotr Suwalski
  • Roberto Lorusso, Paolo Meani, Harold Lazar, Thoracic Research Centre
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review articlepeer-review

Abstract

Despite evidence suggesting the benefit of prophylactic regional antibiotic delivery (RAD) to sternal edges during cardiac surgery, it is seldom performed in clinical practice. The value of topical vancomycin and gentamicin for sternal wound infections (SWI) prophylaxis was further questioned by recent studies including randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to comprehensively assess the safety and effectiveness of RAD to reduce the risk of SWI.We screened multiple databases for RCTs assessing the effectiveness of RAD (vancomycin, gentamicin) in SWI prophylaxis. Random effects meta-analysis was performed. The primary endpoint was any SWI; other wound complications were also analysed. Odds Ratios served as the primary statistical analyses. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed.Thirteen RCTs (N = 7,719 patients) were included. The odds of any SWI were significantly reduced by over 50% with any RAD: OR (95%CIs): 0.49 (0.35-0.68); p < 0.001 and consistently reduced in vancomycin (0.34 [0.18-0.64]; p < 0.001) and gentamicin (0.58 [0.39-0.86]; p = 0.007) groups (p = 0.15). Similarly, RAD reduced the odds of SWI in diabetic and non-diabetic patients (0.46 [0.32-0.65]; p < 0.001 and 0.60 [0.44-0.83]; p = 0.002 respectively). Cumulative Z-curve passed the TSA-adjusted boundary for SWIs suggesting adequate power has been met and no further trials are needed. RAD significantly reduced deep (0.60 [0.43-0.83]; p = 0.003) and superficial SWIs (0.54 [0.32-0.91]; p = 0.02). No differences were seen in mediastinitis and mortality, however, limited number of studies assessed these endpoints. There was no evidence of systemic toxicity, sternal dehiscence and resistant strains emergence. Both vancomycin and gentamicin reduced the odds of cultures outside their respective serum concentrations' activity: vancomycin against gram-negative strains: 0.20 (0.01-4.18) and gentamicin against gram-positive strains: 0.42 (0.28-0.62); P < 0.001. Regional antibiotic delivery is safe and effectively reduces the risk of SWI in cardiac surgery patients.
Original languageEnglish
Article number9690
JournalScientific Reports
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Apr 2024

Keywords

  • Cardiac surgery
  • Mediastinitis
  • Regional antibiotic delivery
  • Sternal wound
  • Humans
  • Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage therapeutic use
  • Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods
  • Vancomycin/administration & dosage
  • Gentamicins/administration & dosage therapeutic use
  • Sternum/surgery microbiology
  • Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Regional antibiotic delivery for sternal wound infection prophylaxis a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this