Redefining the structure of structured reporting in radiology

J. Martijn Nobel; Ellen M. Kok; Simon G. F. Robben

doi:10.1186/s13244-019-0831-6

Redefining the structure of structured reporting in radiology

J. Martijn Nobel^*, Ellen M. Kok, Simon G. F. Robben

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

30 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Structured reporting is advocated as a means of improving reporting in radiology to the ultimate benefit of both radiological and clinical practice. Several large initiatives are currently evaluating its potential. However, with numerous characterizations of the term in circulation, "structured reporting" has become ambiguous and is often confused with "standardization," which may hamper proper evaluation and implementation in clinical practice. This paper provides an overview of interpretations of structured reporting and proposes a clear definition that differentiates structured reporting from standardization. Only a clear uniform definition facilitates evidence-based implementation, enables evaluation of its separate components, and supports (meta-)analyses of literature reports.

Original language	English
Article number	10
Number of pages	5
Journal	Insights into Imaging
Volume	11
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0831-6
Publication status	Published - 4 Feb 2020

Keywords

Structured reporting
Standardized reporting
Radiology report
ENTRY

Access to Document

10.1186/s13244-019-0831-6Licence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{a4cc913277214e009e7599ba7ff5d621,

title = "Redefining the structure of structured reporting in radiology",

abstract = "Structured reporting is advocated as a means of improving reporting in radiology to the ultimate benefit of both radiological and clinical practice. Several large initiatives are currently evaluating its potential. However, with numerous characterizations of the term in circulation, {"}structured reporting{"} has become ambiguous and is often confused with {"}standardization,{"} which may hamper proper evaluation and implementation in clinical practice. This paper provides an overview of interpretations of structured reporting and proposes a clear definition that differentiates structured reporting from standardization. Only a clear uniform definition facilitates evidence-based implementation, enables evaluation of its separate components, and supports (meta-)analyses of literature reports.",

keywords = "Structured reporting, Standardized reporting, Radiology report, ENTRY",

author = "Nobel, {J. Martijn} and Kok, {Ellen M.} and Robben, {Simon G. F.}",

year = "2020",

month = feb,

day = "4",

doi = "10.1186/s13244-019-0831-6",

language = "English",

volume = "11",

journal = "Insights into Imaging",

issn = "1869-4101",

publisher = "SpringerOpen",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Redefining the structure of structured reporting in radiology

AU - Nobel, J. Martijn

AU - Kok, Ellen M.

AU - Robben, Simon G. F.

PY - 2020/2/4

Y1 - 2020/2/4

N2 - Structured reporting is advocated as a means of improving reporting in radiology to the ultimate benefit of both radiological and clinical practice. Several large initiatives are currently evaluating its potential. However, with numerous characterizations of the term in circulation, "structured reporting" has become ambiguous and is often confused with "standardization," which may hamper proper evaluation and implementation in clinical practice. This paper provides an overview of interpretations of structured reporting and proposes a clear definition that differentiates structured reporting from standardization. Only a clear uniform definition facilitates evidence-based implementation, enables evaluation of its separate components, and supports (meta-)analyses of literature reports.

AB - Structured reporting is advocated as a means of improving reporting in radiology to the ultimate benefit of both radiological and clinical practice. Several large initiatives are currently evaluating its potential. However, with numerous characterizations of the term in circulation, "structured reporting" has become ambiguous and is often confused with "standardization," which may hamper proper evaluation and implementation in clinical practice. This paper provides an overview of interpretations of structured reporting and proposes a clear definition that differentiates structured reporting from standardization. Only a clear uniform definition facilitates evidence-based implementation, enables evaluation of its separate components, and supports (meta-)analyses of literature reports.

KW - Structured reporting

KW - Standardized reporting

KW - Radiology report

KW - ENTRY

U2 - 10.1186/s13244-019-0831-6

DO - 10.1186/s13244-019-0831-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 32020396

VL - 11

JO - Insights into Imaging

JF - Insights into Imaging

SN - 1869-4101

IS - 1

M1 - 10

ER -