Recruiting mid-qualified workers in product-innovating firms: Which personality traits matter?

Luisa Minssen*, Mark Levels, Harald Pfeifer, Caroline Wehner

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Change in the work context is an important characteristic of product-innovating firms, and the innovation's profitability often depends on the workers’ adaptive capability to cope with change. Personality traits shape the individual adaptive capability. Nevertheless, the current economic recruitment literature does not discuss personality trait-oriented recruitment in product-innovating firms. We investigate whether recruiters in product-innovating firms prefer mid-qualified job applicants with certain Big Five personality traits. We conduct a discrete choice experiment among 799 firms in Germany and use mixed logit models to estimate the heterogeneous personality preferences of recruiters by distinguishing between firms performing i) radical and ii) incremental product innovations. We find that recruiters prefer more emotionally stable workers regardless of the firm's innovation type. However, recruiters from firms engaging in radical innovations also prefer more conscientious applicants. Our findings have practical implications for firms, applicants and policy makers designing training curricula, because we show that recruiters from product-innovating firms consider personality trait-oriented recruitment not only for high-qualified workers but also for mid-qualified workers.
Original languageEnglish
Article number102267
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
Volume112
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2024

Keywords

  • Discrete choice experiment
  • Employer perspective
  • Personality traits
  • Product innovation
  • Recruitment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recruiting mid-qualified workers in product-innovating firms: Which personality traits matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this