Abstract
The study hypothesis was that the outcome of semitendinosus gracilis double bundle (STG-DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is advantageous in terms of clinical results and restoration of anterior-posterior and rotational laxity in comparison to bone-patellar tendon-bone single-bundle (PTB-SB) ACL reconstruction. We analysed 41 PTB-SB and 51 STG-DB patients using the Tegner, IKDC and WOMAC scores preoperatively and at a minimum follow-up of two years. At follow-up, there was no significant difference in the clinical scores. The KT 1000 side-to-side measurement showed no significant difference between groups. The STG-DB group was significantly superior in terms of the pivot-shift sign and anterior knee pain. We conclude that the outcome of STG-DB reconstruction in the mid-term was not advantageous in terms of clinical scores and anterior-posterior laxity evaluated by the KT 1000. Nevertheless, the restored rotational laxity measured by the pivot shift test was significantly superior in the STG-DB technique.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 127-33 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | International Orthopaedics |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2011 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
- Cohort Studies
- Femur/surgery
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Knee Joint/physiology
- Middle Aged
- Orthopedic Procedures/methods
- Patellar Ligament/surgery
- Prospective Studies
- Range of Motion, Articular/physiology
- Rupture/surgery
- Tibia/surgery
- Time Factors
- Treatment Outcome
- Young Adult