Real and imagined sensory feedback have comparable effects on action anticipation

Ana P Pinheiro*, Michael Schwartze, Francisco Gutiérrez-Domínguez, Sonja A Kotz

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

269 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The forward model monitors the success of sensory feedback to an action and links it to an efference copy originating in the motor system. The Readiness Potential (RP) of the electroencephalogram has been denoted as a neural signature of the efference copy. An open question is whether imagined sensory feedback works similarly to real sensory feedback. We investigated the RP to audible and imagined sounds in a button-press paradigm and assessed the role of sound complexity (vocal vs. non-vocal sound). Sensory feedback (both audible and imagined) in response to a voluntary action modulated the RP amplitude time-locked to the button press. The RP amplitude increase was larger for actions with expected sensory feedback (audible and imagined) than those without sensory feedback, and associated with N1 suppression for audible sounds. Further, the early RP phase was increased when actions elicited an imagined vocal (self-voice) compared to non-vocal sound. Our results support the notion that sensory feedback is anticipated before voluntary actions. This is the case for both audible and imagined sensory feedback and confirms a role of overt and covert feedback in the forward model.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)290-301
Number of pages12
JournalCortex
Volume130
Early online date20 May 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2020

Keywords

  • ACTIVATION PATTERNS
  • Action
  • COROLLARY DISCHARGE
  • EFFERENCE COPY
  • Forward model
  • INTERNAL-MODELS
  • Imagery
  • MENTAL-IMAGERY
  • MIXED-EFFECTS MODELS
  • Readiness potential
  • SPEECH PRODUCTION
  • SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA
  • Self-voice
  • VOICE-SELECTIVE AREAS
  • VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT
  • INNER SPEECH

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Real and imagined sensory feedback have comparable effects on action anticipation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this