Rational decision-making about treatment and care in dementia: A contradiction in terms?

Claire A. G. Wolfs*, Marjolein E. de Vugt, Mike Verkaaik, Marc Haufe, Paul-Jeroen Verkade, Frans R. J. Verhey, Fred Stevens

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

48 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Objective: To gain caregivers' insights into the decision-making process in dementia patients with regard to treatment and care. Methods: Four focus group interviews (n = 29). Results: The decision-making. process consists of three elementary components: (1) identifying an individual's needs; (2) exploring options; and (3) making a choice. The most important phase is the exploration phase as it is crucial for the acceptance of the disease. Furthermore, the decision is experienced more as an emotional choice than a rational one. It is influenced by personal preferences whereas practical aspects do not seem to play a substantial role. Conclusion: Several aspects make decision-making in dementia different from decision-making in the context of other chronic diseases: (1) the difficulty accepting dementia; (2) the progressive nature of dementia; (3) patient's reliance on surrogate decision-making; and (4) strong emotions. Due to these aspects, the decision-making process is very time-consuming, especially the crucial exploration phase. Practice implications: A more active role is required of both the caregiver and the health care professional especially in the exploration phase, enabling easier acceptance and adjustment to the disease. Acceptance is an important condition for reducing anxiety and resistance to care that may offer significant benefits in the future.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-48
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume87
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

Keywords

  • Dementia
  • Cognitive disorder
  • Decision-making
  • Choice
  • Qualitative research
  • Focus group interviews

Cite this