Randomized Comparison Between the Cemented Scientific Hip Prosthesis and Omnifit: 2-Year DEXA and Minimum 10-Year Clinical Follow-Up

Rene H. M. ten Broeke; Steffie E. J. M. Harings; Pieter J. Emans; Liesbeth M. C. Jutten; Alfons G. H. Kessels; Rudolph G. T. Geesink

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2012.09.024

Randomized Comparison Between the Cemented Scientific Hip Prosthesis and Omnifit: 2-Year DEXA and Minimum 10-Year Clinical Follow-Up

Rene H. M. ten Broeke^*
, Steffie E. J. M. Harings
, Pieter J. Emans
, Liesbeth M. C. Jutten
, Alfons G. H. Kessels
, Rudolph G. T. Geesink

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Radiostereometry (RSA) of the cemented Scientific Hip Prosthesis (SHP) reported excessive migration and predicted high failure rates. In a prospective randomized clinical trial we compared minimum 10 years results of the SHP (n=38) with the Omnifit-stem (n=37). Two-year bone remodelling, compared with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and assessed in regions of interest A-D based on the 7 Gruen zones, showed better periprosthetic bone preservation around the SHP in all but one regions (P

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1354-1361
Number of pages	8
Journal	Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume	28
Issue number	8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.09.024
Publication status	Published - Sept 2013

Keywords

hip arthroplasty
cemented
radiostereometry
finite element analysis
bone mineral density
bone densitometryy

Access to Document

10.1016/j.arth.2012.09.024

Cite this

@article{47d9f42349bf4d599ec104bdc4f0031c,

title = "Randomized Comparison Between the Cemented Scientific Hip Prosthesis and Omnifit: 2-Year DEXA and Minimum 10-Year Clinical Follow-Up",

abstract = "Radiostereometry (RSA) of the cemented Scientific Hip Prosthesis (SHP) reported excessive migration and predicted high failure rates. In a prospective randomized clinical trial we compared minimum 10 years results of the SHP (n=38) with the Omnifit-stem (n=37). Two-year bone remodelling, compared with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and assessed in regions of interest A-D based on the 7 Gruen zones, showed better periprosthetic bone preservation around the SHP in all but one regions (P",

keywords = "hip arthroplasty, cemented, radiostereometry, finite element analysis, bone mineral density, bone densitometryy",

author = "\{ten Broeke\}, \{Rene H. M.\} and Harings, \{Steffie E. J. M.\} and Emans, \{Pieter J.\} and Jutten, \{Liesbeth M. C.\} and Kessels, \{Alfons G. H.\} and Geesink, \{Rudolph G. T.\}",

year = "2013",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1016/j.arth.2012.09.024",

language = "English",

volume = "28",

pages = "1354--1361",

journal = "Journal of Arthroplasty",

issn = "0883-5403",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomized Comparison Between the Cemented Scientific Hip Prosthesis and Omnifit: 2-Year DEXA and Minimum 10-Year Clinical Follow-Up

AU - ten Broeke, Rene H. M.

AU - Harings, Steffie E. J. M.

AU - Emans, Pieter J.

AU - Jutten, Liesbeth M. C.

AU - Kessels, Alfons G. H.

AU - Geesink, Rudolph G. T.

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Radiostereometry (RSA) of the cemented Scientific Hip Prosthesis (SHP) reported excessive migration and predicted high failure rates. In a prospective randomized clinical trial we compared minimum 10 years results of the SHP (n=38) with the Omnifit-stem (n=37). Two-year bone remodelling, compared with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and assessed in regions of interest A-D based on the 7 Gruen zones, showed better periprosthetic bone preservation around the SHP in all but one regions (P

AB - Radiostereometry (RSA) of the cemented Scientific Hip Prosthesis (SHP) reported excessive migration and predicted high failure rates. In a prospective randomized clinical trial we compared minimum 10 years results of the SHP (n=38) with the Omnifit-stem (n=37). Two-year bone remodelling, compared with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and assessed in regions of interest A-D based on the 7 Gruen zones, showed better periprosthetic bone preservation around the SHP in all but one regions (P

KW - hip arthroplasty

KW - cemented

KW - radiostereometry

KW - finite element analysis

KW - bone mineral density

KW - bone densitometryy

U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2012.09.024

DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2012.09.024

M3 - Article

C2 - 23453292

SN - 0883-5403

VL - 28

SP - 1354

EP - 1361

JO - Journal of Arthroplasty

JF - Journal of Arthroplasty

IS - 8

ER -

Randomized Comparison Between the Cemented Scientific Hip Prosthesis and Omnifit: 2-Year DEXA and Minimum 10-Year Clinical Follow-Up

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this