Randomized Comparison Between the Cemented Scientific Hip Prosthesis and Omnifit: 2-Year DEXA and Minimum 10-Year Clinical Follow-Up

Rene H. M. ten Broeke*, Steffie E. J. M. Harings, Pieter J. Emans, Liesbeth M. C. Jutten, Alfons G. H. Kessels, Rudolph G. T. Geesink

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Radiostereometry (RSA) of the cemented Scientific Hip Prosthesis (SHP) reported excessive migration and predicted high failure rates. In a prospective randomized clinical trial we compared minimum 10 years results of the SHP (n=38) with the Omnifit-stem (n=37). Two-year bone remodelling, compared with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and assessed in regions of interest A-D based on the 7 Gruen zones, showed better periprosthetic bone preservation around the SHP in all but one regions (P
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1354-1361
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume28
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2013

Keywords

  • hip arthroplasty
  • cemented
  • radiostereometry
  • finite element analysis
  • bone mineral density
  • bone densitometryy

Cite this