Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Maastricht University Home
Support & FAQ
Home
Researchers
Publications
Activities
Press/Media
Prizes
Organisations
Dataset/Software
Projects
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Qualifying choice: ethical reflection on the scope of prenatal screening
Greg Stapleton
*
*
Corresponding author for this work
Metamedica
GROW - Reproductive and Perinatal Medicine
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
Academic
›
peer-review
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Qualifying choice: ethical reflection on the scope of prenatal screening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Prenatal Screening
100%
Ethical Reflection
100%
Reproductive Decision-making
80%
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing
60%
Congenital Disorders
60%
Ethical Issues
40%
Human Genetics
40%
American Society
40%
European Society of Human Genetics
40%
Childhood Diseases
40%
Future Child
20%
Health Care Services
20%
Distributive Justice
20%
Abortion
20%
Genetic Condition
20%
Moral Justification
20%
Informational Privacy
20%
Information Risk
20%
Information Overload
20%
Ethical Communication
20%
Information Issue
20%
INIS
screening
100%
genetics
100%
reflection
100%
humans
80%
testing
60%
congenital diseases
60%
range
40%
information
20%
risks
20%
children
20%
recommendations
20%
health services
20%
abortion
20%
Medicine and Dentistry
Prenatal Screening
100%
Human Genetics
80%
Congenital Disorder
60%
Disease
40%
Health Service
20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
Congenital Disorder
100%