Pulmonary rehabilitation to improve physical capacity, dyspnea, and quality of life following pulmonary embolism (the PeRehab study): study protocol for a two-center randomized controlled trial

S. Haukeland-Parker*, O. Jervan, H.H. Johannessen, J. Gleditsch, K. Stavem, K. Steine, M.A. Spruit, R. Holst, M. Tavoly, F.A. Klok, W. Ghanima

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BackgroundRecently, a large group of patients with persistent dyspnea, poor physical capacity, and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following pulmonary embolism (PE) has been identified and clustered under the name "post pulmonary embolism syndrome" (PPS). These patients seem good candidates for pulmonary rehabilitation. The aim of the study is to explore whether a pulmonary rehabilitation program can improve physical capacity, dyspnea, and HRQoL in PPS patients.MethodsA two-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) is being performed at Ostfold Hospital and Akershus University Hospital in Norway. Patients with PPS are 1:1 randomized into an intervention or a control group. The intervention consists of a supervised, outpatient rehabilitation program twice weekly (1h) for 8weeks provided by experienced physiotherapists. The intervention involves individually adapted exercises based on existing pulmonary rehabilitation programs (relaxation, interval, and resistance training), and an educational session including topics such as normal anatomy and physiology of the respiratory and circulatory system, information on PE/PPS, breathing strategies, and benefits of exercise/physical activity. Patients randomized to the control group receive usual care without specific instructions to exercise.Participants in the intervention and control groups will be compared based on assessments conducted at baseline, 12weeks, and 36weeks after inclusion using the incremental shuttle walk test (primary outcome) and endurance shuttle walk test (exercise capacity), Sensewear activity monitor (daily physical activity), the modified Medical Research Council scale, the Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (dyspnea), and EQ-5D-5L and the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQoL).Recruitment of 190 patients is currently ongoing.DiscussionResults from this study may provide a currently untreated group of PPS patients with an effective treatment resulting in reduced symptoms of dyspnea, improved exercise capacity, and better HRQoL following PE.Trial registrationClinical Trials NCT03405480. Registered prospectively on September 2017.Protocol version 1 (from original protocol September 2017).The study protocol has been reported in accordance with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Clinical Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines (Additional file 1).
Original languageEnglish
Article number22
Number of pages9
JournalTrials
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jan 2021

Keywords

  • Dyspnea
  • Exercise capacity
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Quality of life
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Rrehabilitation
  • dyspnea
  • exercise capacity
  • pulmonary embolism
  • quality of life
  • randomized controlled trial
  • rrehabilitation
  • SAFETY
  • EPISODE
  • CLINICALLY IMPORTANT IMPROVEMENT
  • VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM
  • SHUTTLE WALK TEST
  • DISEASE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pulmonary rehabilitation to improve physical capacity, dyspnea, and quality of life following pulmonary embolism (the PeRehab study): study protocol for a two-center randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this