Pulmonary rehabilitation outcomes in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review

Sara Souto-Miranda; Guilherme Rodrigues; Martijn A Spruit; Alda Marques

doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101564

Pulmonary rehabilitation outcomes in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review

Sara Souto-Miranda, Guilherme Rodrigues, Martijn A Spruit, Alda Marques^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › (Systematic) Review article › peer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The magnitude of response to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is influenced by the selection of outcomes and measures.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to review all outcomes and measures used in clinical trials of PR for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS: The review involved a search of Scopus, Web of Knowledge, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Science Direct and PubMed databases for studies of stable individuals with COPD undergoing PR. Frequency of reporting for each domain, outcome and measure was synthesized by using Microsoft Excel.

RESULTS: We included 267 studies (43153 individuals with COPD). A broad range of domains (n = 22), outcomes (n = 163) and measures (n = 217) were reported. Several measures were used for the same outcome. The most reported outcomes were exercise capacity (n = 218) assessed with the 6-min walk test (n = 140), health-related quality of life (n = 204) assessed with the Saint George's respiratory questionnaire (n = 99), and symptoms (n = 158) assessed with the modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale (n = 56). The least reported outcomes were comorbidities, adverse events and knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review reinforces the need for a core outcome set for PR in individuals with COPD because of high heterogeneity in reported outcomes and measures. Future studies should assess the importance of each outcome for PR involving different stakeholders.

PROSPERO ID: CRD42017079935.

Original language	English
Article number	101564
Number of pages	13
Journal	Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume	65
Issue number	3
Early online date	15 Nov 2021
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101564
Publication status	Published - May 2022

Access to Document

10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101564Licence: Free access - publisher

Cite this

@article{57d9f5ae231c4e2490ec3961b7569a8d,

title = "Pulmonary rehabilitation outcomes in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review",

abstract = "BACKGROUND: The magnitude of response to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is influenced by the selection of outcomes and measures.OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to review all outcomes and measures used in clinical trials of PR for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).METHODS: The review involved a search of Scopus, Web of Knowledge, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Science Direct and PubMed databases for studies of stable individuals with COPD undergoing PR. Frequency of reporting for each domain, outcome and measure was synthesized by using Microsoft Excel.RESULTS: We included 267 studies (43153 individuals with COPD). A broad range of domains (n = 22), outcomes (n = 163) and measures (n = 217) were reported. Several measures were used for the same outcome. The most reported outcomes were exercise capacity (n = 218) assessed with the 6-min walk test (n = 140), health-related quality of life (n = 204) assessed with the Saint George's respiratory questionnaire (n = 99), and symptoms (n = 158) assessed with the modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale (n = 56). The least reported outcomes were comorbidities, adverse events and knowledge.CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review reinforces the need for a core outcome set for PR in individuals with COPD because of high heterogeneity in reported outcomes and measures. Future studies should assess the importance of each outcome for PR involving different stakeholders.PROSPERO ID: CRD42017079935.",

author = "Sara Souto-Miranda and Guilherme Rodrigues and Spruit, {Martijn A} and Alda Marques",

year = "2022",

month = may,

doi = "10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101564",

language = "English",

volume = "65",

journal = "Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine",

issn = "1877-0657",

publisher = "Elsevier Masson",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pulmonary rehabilitation outcomes in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Souto-Miranda, Sara

AU - Rodrigues, Guilherme

AU - Spruit, Martijn A

AU - Marques, Alda

PY - 2022/5

Y1 - 2022/5

N2 - BACKGROUND: The magnitude of response to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is influenced by the selection of outcomes and measures.OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to review all outcomes and measures used in clinical trials of PR for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).METHODS: The review involved a search of Scopus, Web of Knowledge, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Science Direct and PubMed databases for studies of stable individuals with COPD undergoing PR. Frequency of reporting for each domain, outcome and measure was synthesized by using Microsoft Excel.RESULTS: We included 267 studies (43153 individuals with COPD). A broad range of domains (n = 22), outcomes (n = 163) and measures (n = 217) were reported. Several measures were used for the same outcome. The most reported outcomes were exercise capacity (n = 218) assessed with the 6-min walk test (n = 140), health-related quality of life (n = 204) assessed with the Saint George's respiratory questionnaire (n = 99), and symptoms (n = 158) assessed with the modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale (n = 56). The least reported outcomes were comorbidities, adverse events and knowledge.CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review reinforces the need for a core outcome set for PR in individuals with COPD because of high heterogeneity in reported outcomes and measures. Future studies should assess the importance of each outcome for PR involving different stakeholders.PROSPERO ID: CRD42017079935.

AB - BACKGROUND: The magnitude of response to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is influenced by the selection of outcomes and measures.OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to review all outcomes and measures used in clinical trials of PR for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).METHODS: The review involved a search of Scopus, Web of Knowledge, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Science Direct and PubMed databases for studies of stable individuals with COPD undergoing PR. Frequency of reporting for each domain, outcome and measure was synthesized by using Microsoft Excel.RESULTS: We included 267 studies (43153 individuals with COPD). A broad range of domains (n = 22), outcomes (n = 163) and measures (n = 217) were reported. Several measures were used for the same outcome. The most reported outcomes were exercise capacity (n = 218) assessed with the 6-min walk test (n = 140), health-related quality of life (n = 204) assessed with the Saint George's respiratory questionnaire (n = 99), and symptoms (n = 158) assessed with the modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale (n = 56). The least reported outcomes were comorbidities, adverse events and knowledge.CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review reinforces the need for a core outcome set for PR in individuals with COPD because of high heterogeneity in reported outcomes and measures. Future studies should assess the importance of each outcome for PR involving different stakeholders.PROSPERO ID: CRD42017079935.

U2 - 10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101564

DO - 10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101564

M3 - (Systematic) Review article

C2 - 34329794

SN - 1877-0657

VL - 65

JO - Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

JF - Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

IS - 3

M1 - 101564

ER -

Pulmonary rehabilitation outcomes in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this