Publication trends and usefulness of research in hysteroscopic myomectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding: A review of the published literature

J.R.J. Dreessen*, J.F. van der Meulen, M.Y. Bongers, B.W.J. Mol, J. Langenveld

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review article peer-review

Abstract

Despite the amount of research into hysteroscopic myomectomy, questions about the optimal treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding remain. This study reviewed publication trends on this topic from 2002 to 2019 and assessed the usefulness of studies. A total of 580 articles were published on PubMed in this time frame, in 15 different languages. There were meta-analyses (1.6%), systematic reviews (12%), and randomized controlled trials (4.2%). Twelve percent were published in high impact factor journals. After applying our selection criteria, the usefulness of 37 articles was assessed: one article scored high, 31 scored moderate, and five scored low. The costs of these studies were estimated at US$ 971 700.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)692-701
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume161
Issue number3
Early online date1 Dec 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2023

Keywords

  • hysteroscopy
  • leiomyoma
  • menstrual bleeding
  • usefulness
  • SUBMUCOUS MYOMAS
  • FOLLOW-UP
  • RESECTOSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY
  • UTERINE POLYPS
  • TERM
  • RESECTION
  • MORCELLATION
  • MENORRHAGIA
  • MANAGEMENT
  • REMOVAL
  • Leiomyoma
  • Hysteroscopy
  • Menstrual bleeding
  • Usefulness

Cite this