Public agricultural extension workers as boundary workers: Identifying sustainability perspectives in agriculture using Q-methodology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To provide farmers with access to salient knowledge on sustainability that could contribute positively to farmers' livelihoods, there is a need for knowledge facilitators. This paper examines the role of public extension workers as boundary workers in Indonesia on sustainable agriculture and challenges around them.

Design/methodology/approach: To identify sustainability perspectives, this research uses Q-methodology which analyzes individual perspectives on sustainability, their differences, and similarities. This research also employs focus group discussions and interviews. In three regions in Indonesia.

Findings: Q-method resulted in two perspectives. The technologists perceive sustainable agriculture as food security and the use of organic pesticides. They also believe that the responsibility for sustainable agriculture lies with extension workers and governments. The environmentalists believe the concept of sustainability implies the active prevention of environmental degradation. They also believe that everybody should take responsibility for sustainability. The paper determines that boundary work needs highly motivated extension workers; the ability to gain trust from farmers; and government support.

Theoretical implication: This paper contributes to the literature on boundary work by connecting the concept of boundary work to agricultural extension.

Practical implication: The results may be used as inputs for Indonesian policymakers to develop a guideline on sustainable agriculture for extension workers.

Originality/value: In current studies on extension workers in developing countries, an analytical framework which employs the concept of boundary work is hardly found. Boundary work is a relevant concept to depict challenges extension workers are confronted with when brokering. Q-methodology aims to obtain individual perspective on a particular issue. This research provides insight on individual perspectives of extension workers on sustainable agriculture.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-24
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Agricultural Education and Extension
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • ACQUISITION
  • ADVISORY SERVICES
  • Boundary work
  • CHALLENGES
  • DISCOURSES
  • INNOVATION
  • Indonesia
  • KNOWLEDGE
  • OPTIONS
  • Q-methodology
  • SYSTEMS
  • public extension workers
  • sustainability perspectives
  • sustainable agriculture

Cite this

@article{80202ab3b72449f49558f3f392ce4a97,
title = "Public agricultural extension workers as boundary workers: Identifying sustainability perspectives in agriculture using Q-methodology",
abstract = "Purpose: To provide farmers with access to salient knowledge on sustainability that could contribute positively to farmers' livelihoods, there is a need for knowledge facilitators. This paper examines the role of public extension workers as boundary workers in Indonesia on sustainable agriculture and challenges around them.Design/methodology/approach: To identify sustainability perspectives, this research uses Q-methodology which analyzes individual perspectives on sustainability, their differences, and similarities. This research also employs focus group discussions and interviews. In three regions in Indonesia.Findings: Q-method resulted in two perspectives. The technologists perceive sustainable agriculture as food security and the use of organic pesticides. They also believe that the responsibility for sustainable agriculture lies with extension workers and governments. The environmentalists believe the concept of sustainability implies the active prevention of environmental degradation. They also believe that everybody should take responsibility for sustainability. The paper determines that boundary work needs highly motivated extension workers; the ability to gain trust from farmers; and government support.Theoretical implication: This paper contributes to the literature on boundary work by connecting the concept of boundary work to agricultural extension.Practical implication: The results may be used as inputs for Indonesian policymakers to develop a guideline on sustainable agriculture for extension workers.Originality/value: In current studies on extension workers in developing countries, an analytical framework which employs the concept of boundary work is hardly found. Boundary work is a relevant concept to depict challenges extension workers are confronted with when brokering. Q-methodology aims to obtain individual perspective on a particular issue. This research provides insight on individual perspectives of extension workers on sustainable agriculture.",
keywords = "ACQUISITION, ADVISORY SERVICES, Boundary work, CHALLENGES, DISCOURSES, INNOVATION, Indonesia, KNOWLEDGE, OPTIONS, Q-methodology, SYSTEMS, public extension workers, sustainability perspectives, sustainable agriculture",
author = "{Atika Wijaya}, {Atika Wijaya} and Astrid Offermans",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/1389224X.2018.1512875",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "3--24",
journal = "Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension",
issn = "1389-224X",
publisher = "TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public agricultural extension workers as boundary workers: Identifying sustainability perspectives in agriculture using Q-methodology

AU - Atika Wijaya, Atika Wijaya

AU - Offermans, Astrid

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Purpose: To provide farmers with access to salient knowledge on sustainability that could contribute positively to farmers' livelihoods, there is a need for knowledge facilitators. This paper examines the role of public extension workers as boundary workers in Indonesia on sustainable agriculture and challenges around them.Design/methodology/approach: To identify sustainability perspectives, this research uses Q-methodology which analyzes individual perspectives on sustainability, their differences, and similarities. This research also employs focus group discussions and interviews. In three regions in Indonesia.Findings: Q-method resulted in two perspectives. The technologists perceive sustainable agriculture as food security and the use of organic pesticides. They also believe that the responsibility for sustainable agriculture lies with extension workers and governments. The environmentalists believe the concept of sustainability implies the active prevention of environmental degradation. They also believe that everybody should take responsibility for sustainability. The paper determines that boundary work needs highly motivated extension workers; the ability to gain trust from farmers; and government support.Theoretical implication: This paper contributes to the literature on boundary work by connecting the concept of boundary work to agricultural extension.Practical implication: The results may be used as inputs for Indonesian policymakers to develop a guideline on sustainable agriculture for extension workers.Originality/value: In current studies on extension workers in developing countries, an analytical framework which employs the concept of boundary work is hardly found. Boundary work is a relevant concept to depict challenges extension workers are confronted with when brokering. Q-methodology aims to obtain individual perspective on a particular issue. This research provides insight on individual perspectives of extension workers on sustainable agriculture.

AB - Purpose: To provide farmers with access to salient knowledge on sustainability that could contribute positively to farmers' livelihoods, there is a need for knowledge facilitators. This paper examines the role of public extension workers as boundary workers in Indonesia on sustainable agriculture and challenges around them.Design/methodology/approach: To identify sustainability perspectives, this research uses Q-methodology which analyzes individual perspectives on sustainability, their differences, and similarities. This research also employs focus group discussions and interviews. In three regions in Indonesia.Findings: Q-method resulted in two perspectives. The technologists perceive sustainable agriculture as food security and the use of organic pesticides. They also believe that the responsibility for sustainable agriculture lies with extension workers and governments. The environmentalists believe the concept of sustainability implies the active prevention of environmental degradation. They also believe that everybody should take responsibility for sustainability. The paper determines that boundary work needs highly motivated extension workers; the ability to gain trust from farmers; and government support.Theoretical implication: This paper contributes to the literature on boundary work by connecting the concept of boundary work to agricultural extension.Practical implication: The results may be used as inputs for Indonesian policymakers to develop a guideline on sustainable agriculture for extension workers.Originality/value: In current studies on extension workers in developing countries, an analytical framework which employs the concept of boundary work is hardly found. Boundary work is a relevant concept to depict challenges extension workers are confronted with when brokering. Q-methodology aims to obtain individual perspective on a particular issue. This research provides insight on individual perspectives of extension workers on sustainable agriculture.

KW - ACQUISITION

KW - ADVISORY SERVICES

KW - Boundary work

KW - CHALLENGES

KW - DISCOURSES

KW - INNOVATION

KW - Indonesia

KW - KNOWLEDGE

KW - OPTIONS

KW - Q-methodology

KW - SYSTEMS

KW - public extension workers

KW - sustainability perspectives

KW - sustainable agriculture

U2 - 10.1080/1389224X.2018.1512875

DO - 10.1080/1389224X.2018.1512875

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 3

EP - 24

JO - Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension

JF - Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension

SN - 1389-224X

IS - 1

ER -